<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic aCC -AA vs -AP in Operating System - Linux</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/acc-aa-vs-ap/m-p/3877755#M98940</link>
    <description>How long is HP planning on supporting the aCC -AP (aka Classic) compiler PA-RISC HP-UX?  Is there a planned phase out to force transition to -AA (aka Standard).</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Felix R. Jeske</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-10-10T10:31:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>aCC -AA vs -AP</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/acc-aa-vs-ap/m-p/3877755#M98940</link>
      <description>How long is HP planning on supporting the aCC -AP (aka Classic) compiler PA-RISC HP-UX?  Is there a planned phase out to force transition to -AA (aka Standard).</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:31:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/acc-aa-vs-ap/m-p/3877755#M98940</guid>
      <dc:creator>Felix R. Jeske</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-10T10:31:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aCC -AA vs -AP</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/acc-aa-vs-ap/m-p/3877756#M98941</link>
      <description>I'm not sure if we have any plans to obsolete it.  It is the current default and what we suggest ISVs provide.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/acc-aa-vs-ap/m-p/3877756#M98941</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dennis Handly</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-10T17:56:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aCC -AA vs -AP</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/acc-aa-vs-ap/m-p/3877757#M98942</link>
      <description>aCC -AP unfortunately requires unportable source code compared to lots of other compilers on other platforms which typically are ANSI compliant.  The real nightmare scenario is when you get some libraries in -AP format but you want to code in ANSI C++ and can't.  Disappointing to hear there's no phase out strategy of -AP to at least make it consistent with HP-UX on Itanium which has -AA as the default.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:11:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/operating-system-linux/acc-aa-vs-ap/m-p/3877757#M98942</guid>
      <dc:creator>Felix R. Jeske</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-10-10T18:11:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

