<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is surface scan analysis necessary on SSDs? in Disk</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk/is-surface-scan-analysis-necessary-on-ssds/m-p/5557741#M8433</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm having some difficulty finding info about whether surface scans are useful, harmful, or neither&amp;nbsp;on a logical array (RAID 1) composed of solid state drives.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On one hand, SSDs are incredibly less likely than traditional disks to suffer from physical corruption. Also, doesn't a scan create unnecessary activity on the disk and cut into the limited number of writes it can tolerate?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the other hand, from within version 8.70.9.0 of the Array Configuration Utility HP says (without specific reference to SSDs):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Disabling Surface Scan Analysis is not recommended as it will prevent the controller from proactively finding and correcting disk surface errors, which may lead to data loss."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So what does conventional wisdom have to say about scans on SSDs? Thanks in advance for your answers and opinions...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:47:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WFHC-WI</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-20T17:47:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is surface scan analysis necessary on SSDs?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk/is-surface-scan-analysis-necessary-on-ssds/m-p/5557741#M8433</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm having some difficulty finding info about whether surface scans are useful, harmful, or neither&amp;nbsp;on a logical array (RAID 1) composed of solid state drives.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On one hand, SSDs are incredibly less likely than traditional disks to suffer from physical corruption. Also, doesn't a scan create unnecessary activity on the disk and cut into the limited number of writes it can tolerate?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the other hand, from within version 8.70.9.0 of the Array Configuration Utility HP says (without specific reference to SSDs):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Disabling Surface Scan Analysis is not recommended as it will prevent the controller from proactively finding and correcting disk surface errors, which may lead to data loss."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So what does conventional wisdom have to say about scans on SSDs? Thanks in advance for your answers and opinions...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:47:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk/is-surface-scan-analysis-necessary-on-ssds/m-p/5557741#M8433</guid>
      <dc:creator>WFHC-WI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-20T17:47:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

