<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RAID-10 for Everything in Disk</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk/raid-10-for-everything/m-p/5405777#M8624</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have some links for you...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.buzzle.com/articles/raid5-vs-raid10.html"&gt;http://www.buzzle.com/articles/raid5-vs-raid10.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/244377-32-raid-raid-raid"&gt;http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/244377-32-raid-raid-raid&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/raid5-vs-raid-10-safety-performance.html"&gt;http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/raid5-vs-raid-10-safety-performance.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Operating System&amp;nbsp; Mirroring always have low priority as it can be installed from scratch..but Data and application should have high priority in all setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Surendar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:30:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>S_Logan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-30T17:30:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RAID-10 for Everything</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk/raid-10-for-everything/m-p/5400671#M8623</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If RAID-10 is the best for performance and fault tolerance then why should we create&amp;nbsp;seperate RAID for Operating System like RAID-1 and seperate for Application, Database and Data like RAID-5 or RAID-10? Why not use only RAID-10 for all?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any Comments?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;P.S. This thread has been moved&amp;nbsp;from General to Storage &amp;gt; Disk. - Hp Forum MOderator&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2014 01:25:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk/raid-10-for-everything/m-p/5400671#M8623</guid>
      <dc:creator>create share</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-01T01:25:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID-10 for Everything</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk/raid-10-for-everything/m-p/5405777#M8624</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have some links for you...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.buzzle.com/articles/raid5-vs-raid10.html"&gt;http://www.buzzle.com/articles/raid5-vs-raid10.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/244377-32-raid-raid-raid"&gt;http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/244377-32-raid-raid-raid&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) &lt;A target="_blank" href="http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/raid5-vs-raid-10-safety-performance.html"&gt;http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/raid5-vs-raid-10-safety-performance.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Operating System&amp;nbsp; Mirroring always have low priority as it can be installed from scratch..but Data and application should have high priority in all setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Surendar&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:30:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk/raid-10-for-everything/m-p/5405777#M8624</guid>
      <dc:creator>S_Logan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-30T17:30:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID-10 for Everything</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk/raid-10-for-everything/m-p/5431533#M8625</link>
      <description>There's no reason you shouldn't, anything about having to use separate RAID arrays is becoming less and less relevant.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The common reason is because RAID10 is more wasteful than RAID5 and often one RAID5 array performs fine for most user's needs.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 06:29:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk/raid-10-for-everything/m-p/5431533#M8625</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joshua Small_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-29T06:29:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

