<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Modular Smart Array 500 System in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/modular-smart-array-500-system/m-p/3142838#M10552</link>
    <description>Cesar:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You don't say if you are considering the 10k or 15k disks: I'll assum you are comparing alternatives of the same speed (e.g 4 x 72Gb @ 15k or 8 x 36Gb @ 15k)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In general you will get better performance out of more disks (not GENERAL).  Basically you have more physical arms moving &amp;amp; getting to the data quick on more, smaller, disks. However, clearly, more smaller is more expensive:  4 x 72Gb 15k (or 10k) would be quite good, particular if you fully utilise the various RAID options for speed &amp;amp; resilience.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope that helps&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eric</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:20:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Phillip Williams_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-12-12T12:20:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Modular Smart Array 500 System</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/modular-smart-array-500-system/m-p/3142837#M10551</link>
      <description>I plan to purchase the Modular Smart Array 500 System to attach to my HP integrity rx4640. And I was wondering to achieve the best I/O performance should I go with four 70gb HD or should eight 36gb HD, or perhaps it does not make a difference.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/modular-smart-array-500-system/m-p/3142837#M10551</guid>
      <dc:creator>cesar_18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-11T16:55:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Modular Smart Array 500 System</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/modular-smart-array-500-system/m-p/3142838#M10552</link>
      <description>Cesar:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You don't say if you are considering the 10k or 15k disks: I'll assum you are comparing alternatives of the same speed (e.g 4 x 72Gb @ 15k or 8 x 36Gb @ 15k)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In general you will get better performance out of more disks (not GENERAL).  Basically you have more physical arms moving &amp;amp; getting to the data quick on more, smaller, disks. However, clearly, more smaller is more expensive:  4 x 72Gb 15k (or 10k) would be quite good, particular if you fully utilise the various RAID options for speed &amp;amp; resilience.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope that helps&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eric</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:20:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/modular-smart-array-500-system/m-p/3142838#M10552</guid>
      <dc:creator>Phillip Williams_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-12T12:20:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Modular Smart Array 500 System</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/modular-smart-array-500-system/m-p/3142839#M10553</link>
      <description>Thanks, that is what i figure but I just wanted to confirm.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/modular-smart-array-500-system/m-p/3142839#M10553</guid>
      <dc:creator>cesar_18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-12T12:37:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

