<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Better perf. on RA4100 /w 2nd channel? in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/better-perf-on-ra4100-w-2nd-channel/m-p/3153251#M10656</link>
    <description>We are using StorageWorks RAID Array 4000/4100 that is accessed from two different servers. The RA4100 itself has only one FibreChannel port (we use a FC Hub to connect both servers). Can we upgrade our RA4100 to have a second port? Will that improve the overall performance if each server uses a dedicated port?&lt;BR /&gt;We learned that the RA4100 is a retired product. Is it still possible to upgrade it?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Hadi Sukirman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-12-29T10:17:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Better perf. on RA4100 /w 2nd channel?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/better-perf-on-ra4100-w-2nd-channel/m-p/3153251#M10656</link>
      <description>We are using StorageWorks RAID Array 4000/4100 that is accessed from two different servers. The RA4100 itself has only one FibreChannel port (we use a FC Hub to connect both servers). Can we upgrade our RA4100 to have a second port? Will that improve the overall performance if each server uses a dedicated port?&lt;BR /&gt;We learned that the RA4100 is a retired product. Is it still possible to upgrade it?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/better-perf-on-ra4100-w-2nd-channel/m-p/3153251#M10656</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hadi Sukirman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-12-29T10:17:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

