<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Help on array configuration in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/help-on-array-configuration/m-p/3358748#M13306</link>
    <description>The main difference is that:&lt;BR /&gt;two partitons are treated as one phisical HDD&lt;BR /&gt;two arrays are treated as two phisical HDD</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:24:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marino Meloni_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2004-08-18T01:24:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Help on array configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/help-on-array-configuration/m-p/3358746#M13304</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can anyone help me explaining what is the diference between configuring a prolientml370 with a 642 SmartArray with 2 arrays, 1st with raid1(2 HD) and the 2nd with raid5 (3 HD), and configuring the smartarray with only 1 array with 2 partions with RAID5? I mean in performance diferences. Is the only diference the redundancy system? The HD are 72G. The server is to be a files server and the 2 partitions are for SO and Data.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Paulo Meireles</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/help-on-array-configuration/m-p/3358746#M13304</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paulo_28</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-17T06:34:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Help on array configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/help-on-array-configuration/m-p/3358747#M13305</link>
      <description>The benfit of using two separate arrays is that you reduce disk contention for reads and writes.&lt;BR /&gt;If you have all one big array, then the O/S and swap file have to share disk seek time with data reads and writes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since you have so few drives, you will not see much advantage of one RAID5 and two logicals.  You would need more spindles to achive a greater throughput.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2004 06:53:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/help-on-array-configuration/m-p/3358747#M13305</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnWRuffo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-17T06:53:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Help on array configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/help-on-array-configuration/m-p/3358748#M13306</link>
      <description>The main difference is that:&lt;BR /&gt;two partitons are treated as one phisical HDD&lt;BR /&gt;two arrays are treated as two phisical HDD</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 01:24:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/help-on-array-configuration/m-p/3358748#M13306</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marino Meloni_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-08-18T01:24:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

