<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Compatibility of RAID controller in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/compatibility-of-raid-controller/m-p/3485917#M15323</link>
    <description>OK, so I can use it in every&lt;BR /&gt;nonHP server provided that e.g.&lt;BR /&gt;I use corresponding backplane,&lt;BR /&gt;have PCI-X interface. The compatibility&lt;BR /&gt;list is just for HP servers telling&lt;BR /&gt;which servers have such a corresponding&lt;BR /&gt;hardware to work with that.&lt;BR /&gt;Do I understand that well?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:22:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>martvar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-02-21T06:22:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Compatibility of RAID controller</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/compatibility-of-raid-controller/m-p/3485915#M15321</link>
      <description>For e.g. SmartArray 641 RAID controller&lt;BR /&gt;there are mentioned in compatibility list&lt;BR /&gt;just some ProLiant servers,&lt;BR /&gt;should it mean that using it on other&lt;BR /&gt;harware is it possible some problems &lt;BR /&gt;to arise in its functionality?&lt;BR /&gt;Is it not enough to have support in OS&lt;BR /&gt;for that controller, when it uses standard&lt;BR /&gt;PCI-X interface? Why there is a need to&lt;BR /&gt;have specialized hardware?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 06:13:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/compatibility-of-raid-controller/m-p/3485915#M15321</guid>
      <dc:creator>martvar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-15T06:13:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compatibility of RAID controller</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/compatibility-of-raid-controller/m-p/3485916#M15322</link>
      <description>Probably is a match between the server SCSI bus and the controller bus, i.e. U160 rated hotswap backplane. But there is no reason why you could not use it on a slower old bus, just the specs would change, and HP doesn't want to get into logistical problems</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:30:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/compatibility-of-raid-controller/m-p/3485916#M15322</guid>
      <dc:creator>e4services</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-16T10:30:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Compatibility of RAID controller</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/compatibility-of-raid-controller/m-p/3485917#M15323</link>
      <description>OK, so I can use it in every&lt;BR /&gt;nonHP server provided that e.g.&lt;BR /&gt;I use corresponding backplane,&lt;BR /&gt;have PCI-X interface. The compatibility&lt;BR /&gt;list is just for HP servers telling&lt;BR /&gt;which servers have such a corresponding&lt;BR /&gt;hardware to work with that.&lt;BR /&gt;Do I understand that well?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:22:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/compatibility-of-raid-controller/m-p/3485917#M15323</guid>
      <dc:creator>martvar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-02-21T06:22:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

