<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: armlog report in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/armlog-report/m-p/3518787#M15741</link>
    <description>Thank you Aliasgar,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I found out that I have this problem on disk 10 too. Find the attached file, armlog report.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Alireza</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Delrish</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-06T13:21:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>armlog report</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/armlog-report/m-p/3518785#M15739</link>
      <description>Hi Everybody,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a VA7110 it has 15 HDDs. I received this output from “armlog –d M/D12 &lt;STORAGE-ID&gt;”.It is about read errors on disk #12.I cannot understand it. What is ECC used? As you see ,among of “Total Corrected read errors” is two time bigger than “Total MegaBytes read”. On other disks “corrected read” and “ECC used” are much less than “Total Megabyte read”. What do you think. Is disk #12 damaged and I should change it? Does it effect the performance?&lt;BR /&gt;Please advice.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Alireza&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Read Error Counter Page 0x03&lt;BR /&gt;Corrected read errors without delay =55,649,927   &lt;BR /&gt;Corrected read errors with delay = 0&lt;BR /&gt;Corrected read errors with retry = 0&lt;BR /&gt;Total Corrected read errors = 55,649,927   &lt;BR /&gt;Total times read ECC used = 55,649,927   &lt;BR /&gt;Total MegaBytes read = 20,967,853&lt;BR /&gt;Total Unc&lt;/STORAGE-ID&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 04:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/armlog-report/m-p/3518785#M15739</guid>
      <dc:creator>Delrish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-06T04:21:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: armlog report</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/armlog-report/m-p/3518786#M15740</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hi Alireza, &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;can u attach the armlog file .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks/regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Aliasgar.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 07:47:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/armlog-report/m-p/3518786#M15740</guid>
      <dc:creator>aliasgar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-06T07:47:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: armlog report</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/armlog-report/m-p/3518787#M15741</link>
      <description>Thank you Aliasgar,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I found out that I have this problem on disk 10 too. Find the attached file, armlog report.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Alireza</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2005 13:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/armlog-report/m-p/3518787#M15741</guid>
      <dc:creator>Delrish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-06T13:21:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

