<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic VA7410 in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va7410/m-p/3627399#M17675</link>
    <description>First configuration question.&lt;BR /&gt;If I had a VA7410 and 5 additional enclosures, and was loading it with 60 x 36 GB drives, would I evenly spread the drives between the enclosures leaving 5 bays empty on each enclosure?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have quotes for set-ups with 60x36GB drives and 26x 73GB drives.  All drives are 15Krpm.  Any thoughts on performance between the two set-ups or would they be negligable?</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:57:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Thatcher Furgerson_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-09-15T15:57:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VA7410</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va7410/m-p/3627399#M17675</link>
      <description>First configuration question.&lt;BR /&gt;If I had a VA7410 and 5 additional enclosures, and was loading it with 60 x 36 GB drives, would I evenly spread the drives between the enclosures leaving 5 bays empty on each enclosure?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have quotes for set-ups with 60x36GB drives and 26x 73GB drives.  All drives are 15Krpm.  Any thoughts on performance between the two set-ups or would they be negligable?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:57:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va7410/m-p/3627399#M17675</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thatcher Furgerson_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-15T15:57:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VA7410</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va7410/m-p/3627400#M17676</link>
      <description>The disks in the unpair slots are bundled in redundancy group 1 en the disks in the pair slots are bundled in the redundancy group 2.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is a good idea to leave 5 bays empty on each enclosure but the capacity in each RG will be different.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With AUTORAID you have the following usefull capacity for the drives&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;73 GB =&amp;gt; 66 GB usable&lt;BR /&gt;36 GB =&amp;gt; 32 GB usable&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Usable capacity with autoraid&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;26 x 73 =&amp;gt; 1.7 TB&lt;BR /&gt;60 x 36 =&amp;gt; 1.9 TB&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The performance will be better with 36 GB HD, but i don't know if will see any difference in your application</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va7410/m-p/3627400#M17676</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luk Vandenbussche</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-16T01:27:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VA7410</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va7410/m-p/3627401#M17677</link>
      <description>Is there any special considerations or recommendations for AUTORAID configuration for oracle?  For example, should I have a mount point on a lv for roll back, one or more for data/index, one for archive?  This will be my first time with autoraid (I have an FC60 now).</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:18:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va7410/m-p/3627401#M17677</guid>
      <dc:creator>Thatcher Furgerson_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-16T09:18:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VA7410</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va7410/m-p/3627402#M17678</link>
      <description>Considering the virtual architecture of VA Array ,it is a good to have a setup with 60X36GB spread evenly across all enclosures.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One can have good I/O performance out of VA if it has many as possible disk spindles. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;VA has default operating RAID level as AutoRAID . You have option to choose RAID 1+0 for whole array while initial setup.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In the AutoRAID mode , VA uses combination of RAID 1+0 and RAID5DP . Depending on the how host access the data on the array . It automatically uses RAID 1+0 for most and Direct I/O (write intensive data )  and RAID5DP for  sequencial I/O  ( less write intensive data ). So you get the performance benefit ( RAID 1+0 ) plus storage cost benefit ( RAID5DP )&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Selecting the RAID level depends on your oracle application behaviour and concern about storage cost.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As per HP doc, AutoRAID is good upto 50 to 200GB storage.But I have seen I/O performance issues with AutoRAID having less storage than it. So it depends on application I/O load.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If the cost of storage is not a concern, one should go for RAID 1+0 for Oracle application because with RAID 1+0  , one can have a balanced I/O throughput no matter what you have I/O pattern ( Direct , sequential , Random )&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It is better to create separate Lvs for Data , Index , Redo and Archive logs.&lt;BR /&gt;Archive log , second pair of Redo log and a control file could be placed in RG2.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:51:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va7410/m-p/3627402#M17678</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sameer_Nirmal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-09-18T18:51:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

