<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic EVA VA comparision in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-va-comparision/m-p/3664957#M18339</link>
    <description>Does anyone know of a good doc comparing EVA3000 overall performance to a VA7410&lt;BR /&gt;What would I expect to see if anything performance wise by going to a 3000 or would I need to go to a EVA4000</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:16:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lacrosse</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-11-04T15:16:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EVA VA comparision</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-va-comparision/m-p/3664957#M18339</link>
      <description>Does anyone know of a good doc comparing EVA3000 overall performance to a VA7410&lt;BR /&gt;What would I expect to see if anything performance wise by going to a 3000 or would I need to go to a EVA4000</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:16:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-va-comparision/m-p/3664957#M18339</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lacrosse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-04T15:16:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA VA comparision</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-va-comparision/m-p/3664958#M18340</link>
      <description>The VA7410 is about 77% of the performance of the EVA3000, according to an internal doc I have here.  Of course I can't post it,&lt;BR /&gt;and your mileage may vary.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The EVA doesn't have the overhead of the AutoRAID, so that, coupled with faster CPUs makes it quite a bit faster.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now, that said, go with the EVA4000 - the EVA3000 is getting ready for EOL, and the EVA4000 has even faster processors, among other improvements.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Vince</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:31:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-va-comparision/m-p/3664958#M18340</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vincent Fleming</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-04T15:31:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA VA comparision</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-va-comparision/m-p/3664959#M18341</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Compare these Quick Specs for EVA and VA products. Will get a good idea on the performance and scalability and redundancy levels.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For EVA&lt;BR /&gt;==========&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12236_div/12236_div.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12236_div/12236_div.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For VA&lt;BR /&gt;==========&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11558_div/11558_div.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/11558_div/11558_div.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this help.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Syam</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 05:08:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-va-comparision/m-p/3664959#M18341</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ranjith_5</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-05T05:08:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

