<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: xp128 2D+2D configuration. in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp128-2d-2d-configuration/m-p/3676270#M18503</link>
    <description>So, why does it need 3 altanative path?&lt;BR /&gt;,for load distributing or bcopy ?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:24:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>???_185</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-11-23T01:24:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>xp128 2D+2D configuration.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp128-2d-2d-configuration/m-p/3676267#M18500</link>
      <description>this is one vgdisplay capture.as you can see one disk have three alternative disk.&lt;BR /&gt;does it required to configure 2D+2D?&lt;BR /&gt;I roughly understand i has been needed due to bcopy.  but I don't know exactly.&lt;BR /&gt;I mean how does disk can split and mirror?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;PV Name                     /dev/dsk/c12t0d1&lt;BR /&gt;   PV Name                     /dev/dsk/c10t0d1 Alternate Link&lt;BR /&gt;   PV Name                     /dev/dsk/c13t0d1 Alternate Link&lt;BR /&gt;   PV Name                     /dev/dsk/c9t0d1  Alternate Link&lt;BR /&gt;   PV Status                   available&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:57:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp128-2d-2d-configuration/m-p/3676267#M18500</guid>
      <dc:creator>???_185</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-22T02:57:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: xp128 2D+2D configuration.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp128-2d-2d-configuration/m-p/3676268#M18501</link>
      <description>This are not alternative disks, but alternative pathes.&lt;BR /&gt;Your system is able to "see" a LUN thru 4 FC interfaces/pathes.&lt;BR /&gt;Have a look at the "xpinfo [-i]" output.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:51:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp128-2d-2d-configuration/m-p/3676268#M18501</guid>
      <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-22T09:51:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: xp128 2D+2D configuration.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp128-2d-2d-configuration/m-p/3676269#M18502</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;It means your 2D+2D ldev/LUN is presented to 4 HBA's to your server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;With LVM it is shown as PVLINKS or Alternate Paths. Under this config - ONLY ONE active path to your LUN is active.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Same with VxVM DMP with the advantage of actually distributing load accross the 4 paths</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:40:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp128-2d-2d-configuration/m-p/3676269#M18502</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-22T13:40:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: xp128 2D+2D configuration.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp128-2d-2d-configuration/m-p/3676270#M18503</link>
      <description>So, why does it need 3 altanative path?&lt;BR /&gt;,for load distributing or bcopy ?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:24:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp128-2d-2d-configuration/m-p/3676270#M18503</guid>
      <dc:creator>???_185</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-23T01:24:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: xp128 2D+2D configuration.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp128-2d-2d-configuration/m-p/3676271#M18504</link>
      <description>Hi Zungwon,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Well the answer to that could be:&lt;BR /&gt;1. your IT shop standards state that LUNs must be distributed to more than 1 path&lt;BR /&gt;2. yes for load balancing&lt;BR /&gt;3. in cases where access to a LUN via the primary is inaccessible, the alternate path can be used&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:22:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp128-2d-2d-configuration/m-p/3676271#M18504</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edgar_8</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-11-23T03:22:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

