<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Too slow Raid 5 on Smart Array 641 in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/too-slow-raid-5-on-smart-array-641/m-p/3776200#M20191</link>
    <description>Yes, this has been proven to produce an 8x increase inperformance on writes due to the cache. Another issue comes up if Windows is istall on the RAID 5 set, with Windows again adding to the overhead with it's continued writes of the virtual file.&lt;BR /&gt;So, &lt;BR /&gt;1-add the Battery/write cache module.&lt;BR /&gt;2-move Windows to a stand alone drive off of the RAID controller, it has enough to do.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:37:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>e4services</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-04-24T08:37:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Too slow Raid 5 on Smart Array 641</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/too-slow-raid-5-on-smart-array-641/m-p/3776198#M20189</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm suffering an amazing slow performance with 5 disks in raid 5 on my Smart Array 641.&lt;BR /&gt;(5 * 36Gb 10Krpm disks)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When I try to copy big files other the 1Gbps network I stop the transfert after 10 minutes!!!&lt;BR /&gt;Copying the same file on another server takes less then 2 minutes (1 SATA2 disk!!!!)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The windows performance counters display that the % disk time is greater then 1000%, the Avg Disks Queue length is greater then 22.&lt;BR /&gt;Copying the file locally produce good performance counter values (queue = 2-3; % disk time = 30-35%) but the copy takes again more then 10 minutes!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Hd Tune utility result is 40Mb/s for my Raid 5, while my standalone SATA2 disk result is 50mb/s.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My drivers are up-to-date.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;what can I do???&lt;BR /&gt;thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 09:43:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/too-slow-raid-5-on-smart-array-641/m-p/3776198#M20189</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jerome Poudou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-23T09:43:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Too slow Raid 5 on Smart Array 641</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/too-slow-raid-5-on-smart-array-641/m-p/3776199#M20190</link>
      <description>Do you use / have you got the battery backed write cache?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;RAID 5 due to its algorithm has a large write overhead &amp;amp; in most scenarios is much slower for writing than a single drive if implemented without a write cache.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 03:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/too-slow-raid-5-on-smart-array-641/m-p/3776199#M20190</guid>
      <dc:creator>raadek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-24T03:16:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Too slow Raid 5 on Smart Array 641</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/too-slow-raid-5-on-smart-array-641/m-p/3776200#M20191</link>
      <description>Yes, this has been proven to produce an 8x increase inperformance on writes due to the cache. Another issue comes up if Windows is istall on the RAID 5 set, with Windows again adding to the overhead with it's continued writes of the virtual file.&lt;BR /&gt;So, &lt;BR /&gt;1-add the Battery/write cache module.&lt;BR /&gt;2-move Windows to a stand alone drive off of the RAID controller, it has enough to do.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:37:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/too-slow-raid-5-on-smart-array-641/m-p/3776200#M20191</guid>
      <dc:creator>e4services</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-24T08:37:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

