<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Optimal Disk Configuration in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/optimal-disk-configuration/m-p/3786531#M20353</link>
    <description>As far as i can see we have to keep the log files on the same array or at least the same controller and scsi channels.&lt;BR /&gt;The best i can do it break out the log files logical disks and put them in their own array but due to budget constraints i dont have any spare drives to play with.&lt;BR /&gt;This is what we have and the solution we are working with is called SAP&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;DL380 G4 Server Internal&lt;BR /&gt;2 x 72.8GB 0+1 (16GB O/S, remainder is static data)&lt;BR /&gt;2 x 72.8GB 0+1 4.1GB Swap, 4.1GB Swap, 2.1GB Swap remainder wasted. This allows a 10GB Swap file required by SAP.&lt;BR /&gt;2 x 72.8GB 0+1 Executable SAP Files&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;MSA 30&lt;BR /&gt;14 x 72.8GB&lt;BR /&gt;They has asked that i make 2 x 72.8 0+1 for logs, 2 x 72.8 0+1 for TempDB.&lt;BR /&gt;Then they need Data drives 1 through 5.&lt;BR /&gt;I have made this on 0+1 array and partitioned it in the O/S&lt;BR /&gt;They were asking for each one to be a seperate mirror which i think is a terrible idea.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you can think of a better config let me know.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 08:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Davenport</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-05-11T08:04:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Optimal Disk Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/optimal-disk-configuration/m-p/3786529#M20351</link>
      <description>Hi all, performance question here.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The MSA30 is attached via a 6402 controller and contains 14 x 72.8GB drives.&lt;BR /&gt;The server will be running SQL 2000 on Windows 2003 R2.&lt;BR /&gt;As far as the disks are concerned I am being asked to configure all the drives in the MSA30 as 7, 2 disk mirrors and make each logical drive 72.8GB.  Each mirrored pair will have 1 partition created on it.&lt;BR /&gt;The justification for this is that it would allow maximum performance for the log file partition and the various data and DB partitions.&lt;BR /&gt;In my understanding this would not be as good as making 1, 0+1 array across all disks and then partitioning the logical drive down in the O/S.&lt;BR /&gt;My argument is that each read and write operation will have at least 7 heads to choose from. And therefore boost performance.&lt;BR /&gt;Maybe I am wrong, could someone shed some light?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 07:24:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/optimal-disk-configuration/m-p/3786529#M20351</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Davenport</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-11T07:24:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimal Disk Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/optimal-disk-configuration/m-p/3786530#M20352</link>
      <description>Andrew,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You are right performance will be better with the data striped across more mirrored pairs, and then logically divided into LUN's on the O/S.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This is kinda how the EVA array controllers do it, by creating a disk group (array) and creating LUN's within it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The only question really is do you want to keep the DB &amp;amp; Logfiles / Redo logs on the same array ?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 07:38:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/optimal-disk-configuration/m-p/3786530#M20352</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jefferson Humber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-11T07:38:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Optimal Disk Configuration</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/optimal-disk-configuration/m-p/3786531#M20353</link>
      <description>As far as i can see we have to keep the log files on the same array or at least the same controller and scsi channels.&lt;BR /&gt;The best i can do it break out the log files logical disks and put them in their own array but due to budget constraints i dont have any spare drives to play with.&lt;BR /&gt;This is what we have and the solution we are working with is called SAP&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;DL380 G4 Server Internal&lt;BR /&gt;2 x 72.8GB 0+1 (16GB O/S, remainder is static data)&lt;BR /&gt;2 x 72.8GB 0+1 4.1GB Swap, 4.1GB Swap, 2.1GB Swap remainder wasted. This allows a 10GB Swap file required by SAP.&lt;BR /&gt;2 x 72.8GB 0+1 Executable SAP Files&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;MSA 30&lt;BR /&gt;14 x 72.8GB&lt;BR /&gt;They has asked that i make 2 x 72.8 0+1 for logs, 2 x 72.8 0+1 for TempDB.&lt;BR /&gt;Then they need Data drives 1 through 5.&lt;BR /&gt;I have made this on 0+1 array and partitioned it in the O/S&lt;BR /&gt;They were asking for each one to be a seperate mirror which i think is a terrible idea.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you can think of a better config let me know.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 08:04:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/optimal-disk-configuration/m-p/3786531#M20353</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Davenport</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-05-11T08:04:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

