<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic vgchgid fails with IBM MetroMirror target in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/vgchgid-fails-with-ibm-metromirror-target/m-p/3800359#M20550</link>
    <description>MetroMirror is equivalent to EMC BCVs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Following successful copy from source to target disk, and attempt to run vgchgid (since we intend to use the target volume on the same host), the following error is presented&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# vgchgid /dev/rdsk/c10t7d1&lt;BR /&gt;vgchgid: physical volume "/dev/rdsk/c10t7d1" must be one of the following.&lt;BR /&gt;1. A EMC BCV or EMC RDF2.&lt;BR /&gt;2. XP disk array CA_SVOL or XP disk array BC_SVOL.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does this look like LVM patch issue ?  I was thinking maybe a throwback to days when only volumes copied on EMC and Hitachi arrays were recognized by vgchgid.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If so does anyone know what minimum patch would be needed for support of *other* arrays capable of the 'BCV like' disk replication features ?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Cooper_11</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-06-05T13:36:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>vgchgid fails with IBM MetroMirror target</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/vgchgid-fails-with-ibm-metromirror-target/m-p/3800359#M20550</link>
      <description>MetroMirror is equivalent to EMC BCVs.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Following successful copy from source to target disk, and attempt to run vgchgid (since we intend to use the target volume on the same host), the following error is presented&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;# vgchgid /dev/rdsk/c10t7d1&lt;BR /&gt;vgchgid: physical volume "/dev/rdsk/c10t7d1" must be one of the following.&lt;BR /&gt;1. A EMC BCV or EMC RDF2.&lt;BR /&gt;2. XP disk array CA_SVOL or XP disk array BC_SVOL.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does this look like LVM patch issue ?  I was thinking maybe a throwback to days when only volumes copied on EMC and Hitachi arrays were recognized by vgchgid.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If so does anyone know what minimum patch would be needed for support of *other* arrays capable of the 'BCV like' disk replication features ?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 13:36:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/vgchgid-fails-with-ibm-metromirror-target/m-p/3800359#M20550</guid>
      <dc:creator>John Cooper_11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-06-05T13:36:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

