<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MSA Vs. EVA in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa-vs-eva/m-p/3824408#M20967</link>
    <description>MSA - Fiber connection&lt;BR /&gt;    - SCSI on disk&lt;BR /&gt;    - Limited mix off OS (HPUX not in heterognous environment&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;EVA - Fiber connection&lt;BR /&gt;    - Fiber to disk&lt;BR /&gt;    - No limition in mix of OS&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I advise EVA arrays</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Luk Vandenbussche</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-07-17T02:23:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MSA Vs. EVA</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa-vs-eva/m-p/3824407#M20966</link>
      <description>What is the different between the MSA and the EVA?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 17:01:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa-vs-eva/m-p/3824407#M20966</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nicolas Pla</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-16T17:01:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA Vs. EVA</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa-vs-eva/m-p/3824408#M20967</link>
      <description>MSA - Fiber connection&lt;BR /&gt;    - SCSI on disk&lt;BR /&gt;    - Limited mix off OS (HPUX not in heterognous environment&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;EVA - Fiber connection&lt;BR /&gt;    - Fiber to disk&lt;BR /&gt;    - No limition in mix of OS&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I advise EVA arrays</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 02:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa-vs-eva/m-p/3824408#M20967</guid>
      <dc:creator>Luk Vandenbussche</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-17T02:23:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA Vs. EVA</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa-vs-eva/m-p/3824409#M20968</link>
      <description>Nicolas,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As mentioned above there are a few differences in connectivity.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;EVA's will give higher performance too, since they can be scaled far greater than MSA's.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, this comes at a cost.  If you can live with the limitations of the MSA you will save a lot of cash.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It all depends on what you need, and what you think you may need in the future.  The EVA is the better option for future proofing, but comes at a price.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;J</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 04:32:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa-vs-eva/m-p/3824409#M20968</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jefferson Humber</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-17T04:32:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

