<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: test eva performance in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/test-eva-performance/m-p/3851625#M21441</link>
    <description>Well, it depends on _what_ you want to test. For Windows, I suggest that you pick up the "IOMETER" program.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But be warned - the "performance" (I/Os per sec or MB per sec) heavily depends on the IO pattern that you define. Play a bit with it; choose between random and sequential IO, increase the IO size or the number of outstanding IOs... and you will see what I mean - you can pretty much create a result that you want ;-)</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:44:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-08-28T11:44:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>test eva performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/test-eva-performance/m-p/3851624#M21440</link>
      <description>Any one knows how can i test the performance of my EVA. I have one disk presented to one server, I wanna copy some data on it, I wanna know how many MB can i copy on my EVA drive.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:59:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/test-eva-performance/m-p/3851624#M21440</guid>
      <dc:creator>simon_164</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-28T09:59:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: test eva performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/test-eva-performance/m-p/3851625#M21441</link>
      <description>Well, it depends on _what_ you want to test. For Windows, I suggest that you pick up the "IOMETER" program.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But be warned - the "performance" (I/Os per sec or MB per sec) heavily depends on the IO pattern that you define. Play a bit with it; choose between random and sequential IO, increase the IO size or the number of outstanding IOs... and you will see what I mean - you can pretty much create a result that you want ;-)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:44:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/test-eva-performance/m-p/3851625#M21441</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-28T11:44:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: test eva performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/test-eva-performance/m-p/3851626#M21442</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;My experience with the EVA arrays has been that to achieve anything close to their best when running many simultaneous job streams. Total throughput just keeps going up up up.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/test-eva-performance/m-p/3851626#M21442</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tom O'Toole</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-31T16:03:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: test eva performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/test-eva-performance/m-p/3851627#M21443</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;arf...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sorry, I meant that you need many parallel jobs to achieve top throughput, in case that was less than clear:-)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 16:06:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/test-eva-performance/m-p/3851627#M21443</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tom O'Toole</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-31T16:06:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

