<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CA Question on xp12k in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/ca-question-on-xp12k/m-p/3927021#M22602</link>
    <description>1)is it possible to create pairs CA between ldevs which are part of two differnt clprs&lt;BR /&gt;2)is it possible to create pairs and make them part of same consistency group CA between ldevs which are part of two differnt clprs&lt;BR /&gt;3)How to make a pairs the part of same consistency group while creating pair using raid mgr.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:05:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>manu101</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-01-16T10:05:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CA Question on xp12k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/ca-question-on-xp12k/m-p/3927021#M22602</link>
      <description>1)is it possible to create pairs CA between ldevs which are part of two differnt clprs&lt;BR /&gt;2)is it possible to create pairs and make them part of same consistency group CA between ldevs which are part of two differnt clprs&lt;BR /&gt;3)How to make a pairs the part of same consistency group while creating pair using raid mgr.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:05:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/ca-question-on-xp12k/m-p/3927021#M22602</guid>
      <dc:creator>manu101</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-16T10:05:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CA Question on xp12k</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/ca-question-on-xp12k/m-p/3927022#M22603</link>
      <description>1. If you mean can you CA an ldev from CLPR0 on array A to an ldev in CLPR1 on array B the answer is yes.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2. No. From the Command View User guide:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;"If Continuous Access XP Asynchronous or TrueCopy for z/OS Asynchronous operations are&lt;BR /&gt;performed, and the volumes that are extended over multiple CLPRs are allocated to the same&lt;BR /&gt;consistency group, a pair cannot be created."&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;3. It is part if the "-f Fence" specification form the paircreate command:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;â  f fence [CTGID](CA only) Specifies a data-consistency level.&lt;BR /&gt;Valid values:&lt;BR /&gt;async CTGID (CA-Async and CA-Journal only)&lt;BR /&gt;data&lt;BR /&gt;status&lt;BR /&gt;never&lt;BR /&gt;CTGID (CT group ID) is assigned automatically, but the async option terminates with EX_ENOCTG when beyond the maximum number of CT groups.&lt;BR /&gt;136 HP StorageWorks Disk Array XP RAID Manager: Userâ  s Guide&lt;BR /&gt;Maximum number:&lt;BR /&gt;XP25616(0-15)&lt;BR /&gt;XP51264(0-63)&lt;BR /&gt;XP1024128(0-127)&lt;BR /&gt;XP10000256(0-255)&lt;BR /&gt;XP12000256(0-255)&lt;BR /&gt;The CTGID option forces creation of paired volumes for a given CTGID group.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I suggest you get a copy of the RaidManager XP User Guide.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:45:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/ca-question-on-xp12k/m-p/3927022#M22603</guid>
      <dc:creator>Joseph Algieri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-01-19T13:45:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

