<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: New bridges in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/new-bridges/m-p/2553625#M2305</link>
    <description>Bruno,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When the bridges were changed did the&lt;BR /&gt;configurations of the bridges changed&lt;BR /&gt;to that of the previous ones. The NO_HW&lt;BR /&gt;will appear and sometimes on different&lt;BR /&gt;paths if the configuraitons are not the&lt;BR /&gt;same, i.e I am quite sure that if you &lt;BR /&gt;check that the bridges most likely have  &lt;BR /&gt;arbitrated loop and should be set for &lt;BR /&gt;fabric. I have had this problem with a &lt;BR /&gt;A4688A and this fixed it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You will need to run ioscan -fn several&lt;BR /&gt;times in order to get it working, as well&lt;BR /&gt;as rebooting your switch. You may even &lt;BR /&gt;need to boot your server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Michael</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2001 23:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael Tully</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2001-07-17T23:56:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New bridges</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/new-bridges/m-p/2553624#M2304</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;in a HP 9000/800 box running HP-UX 11.00 I had a Brocade FC card with three bridges connected (3300 model) working fine, recently the bridges wore switched by 3200 models and I'm getting this when I do a ioscan:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;fc          0  1/10/0/0               td        CLAIMED     INTERFACE    HP Tachyon TL/TS Fibre Channel Mass Storage Adapter&lt;BR /&gt;fcp         0  1/10/0/0.1             fcp       CLAIMED     INTERFACE    FCP Domain&lt;BR /&gt;ext_bus     8  1/10/0/0.1.16.255.0    fcpdev    NO_HW       INTERFACE    FCP Device Interface&lt;BR /&gt;target     17  1/10/0/0.1.16.255.0.0  tgt       NO_HW       DEVICE       &lt;BR /&gt;ext_bus     9  1/10/0/0.1.17.255.0    fcpdev    NO_HW       INTERFACE    FCP Device Interface&lt;BR /&gt;target     18  1/10/0/0.1.17.255.0.0  tgt       NO_HW       DEVICE       &lt;BR /&gt;ext_bus    10  1/10/0/0.1.18.255.0    fcpdev    NO_HW       INTERFACE    FCP Device Interface&lt;BR /&gt;target     19  1/10/0/0.1.18.255.0.0  tgt       NO_HW       DEVICE       &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What can I do to get CLAIMED instead of NO_HW ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bruno Cunha</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:42:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/new-bridges/m-p/2553624#M2304</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bruno Cunha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-07-17T09:42:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New bridges</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/new-bridges/m-p/2553625#M2305</link>
      <description>Bruno,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;When the bridges were changed did the&lt;BR /&gt;configurations of the bridges changed&lt;BR /&gt;to that of the previous ones. The NO_HW&lt;BR /&gt;will appear and sometimes on different&lt;BR /&gt;paths if the configuraitons are not the&lt;BR /&gt;same, i.e I am quite sure that if you &lt;BR /&gt;check that the bridges most likely have  &lt;BR /&gt;arbitrated loop and should be set for &lt;BR /&gt;fabric. I have had this problem with a &lt;BR /&gt;A4688A and this fixed it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You will need to run ioscan -fn several&lt;BR /&gt;times in order to get it working, as well&lt;BR /&gt;as rebooting your switch. You may even &lt;BR /&gt;need to boot your server.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Michael</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2001 23:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/new-bridges/m-p/2553625#M2305</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael Tully</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-07-17T23:56:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New bridges</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/new-bridges/m-p/2553626#M2306</link>
      <description>Hi again Bruno,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I found this little snippet in my e-mail just now about a similar problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;Michael&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;========================================================&lt;BR /&gt;TODAY'S SAN/NAS TECHNICAL TIP&lt;BR /&gt;========================================================&lt;BR /&gt;SAN troubleshooting: Port/device mismatch&lt;BR /&gt;Rick Cook&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;SAN devices come in two main flavors, and mixing them up is one of&lt;BR /&gt;the most common causes of problems with a SAN. It can be especially&lt;BR /&gt;difficult to troubleshoot because the first line of diagnostics, the&lt;BR /&gt;port lights on the switch, won't show the problem.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Devices such as HBAs can be either switch fabric (FC-SW) or&lt;BR /&gt;arbitrated loop (FC-AL). The problem comes when the device thinks it&lt;BR /&gt;is one and the port on the switch thinks it is the other. While&lt;BR /&gt;fabric devices can communicate with loop devices, it often doesn't&lt;BR /&gt;work the other way around. This is particularly frustrating because&lt;BR /&gt;the port light for the port the device is attached to will turn&lt;BR /&gt;green, indicating a successful connection, when in fact the device&lt;BR /&gt;and the port aren't communicating.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To check for this kind of mismatch, log into the switch and see if&lt;BR /&gt;the port is set for FC-AL or FC-SW. Once you figure out what is going&lt;BR /&gt;on, the fix is a matter of resetting the port and rebooting the&lt;BR /&gt;system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A brief description of troubleshooting SANs can be found at the&lt;BR /&gt;VALUEVAD web site at: &lt;A href="http://www.valuevad.com/.%5Cnews%5CIMnews40.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.valuevad.com/.%5Cnews%5CIMnews40.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:20:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/new-bridges/m-p/2553626#M2306</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael Tully</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-07-18T00:20:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New bridges</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/new-bridges/m-p/2553627#M2307</link>
      <description>Hi Michael, tonight I did a reboot of the server and it worked, I couldn't get it working without the reboot. &lt;BR /&gt;The unix servers are getting close of windows in matter of reboots to get things going !&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for your help&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:57:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/new-bridges/m-p/2553627#M2307</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bruno Cunha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2001-07-18T07:57:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

