<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: xp1024 rebuild disk in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp1024-rebuild-disk/m-p/4116466#M25702</link>
    <description>If the array preventive fail the drive, it can copy the data directly to the spare. If the disk unexpectedly fails, the array must probably recalculate the RAID (depends on priority).&lt;BR /&gt;Once the disk is replaced, there will a direct copy take place. Such a copy does not influence performance.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:50:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-13T18:50:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>xp1024 rebuild disk</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp1024-rebuild-disk/m-p/4116465#M25701</link>
      <description>Hi Gurus,&lt;BR /&gt;My question is : on a XP1024 Raid 5 setup when a disk fails and hotspare is used, would the effected array group suffer from performance degradation? Would this also applies when the 'faulty' drive is replace with a new drive?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;i was told that on the XP1024, there is NO performance degradation, is this true?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:44:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp1024-rebuild-disk/m-p/4116465#M25701</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wilson Yew</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-13T17:44:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: xp1024 rebuild disk</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp1024-rebuild-disk/m-p/4116466#M25702</link>
      <description>If the array preventive fail the drive, it can copy the data directly to the spare. If the disk unexpectedly fails, the array must probably recalculate the RAID (depends on priority).&lt;BR /&gt;Once the disk is replaced, there will a direct copy take place. Such a copy does not influence performance.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:50:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp1024-rebuild-disk/m-p/4116466#M25702</guid>
      <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-13T18:50:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: xp1024 rebuild disk</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp1024-rebuild-disk/m-p/4116467#M25703</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can I add a follow-up question to this please?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In terms of swapping over and fitting the hotspare, is this literally a case of swapping over the disk or are there some authentication codes to be aware of?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp1024-rebuild-disk/m-p/4116467#M25703</guid>
      <dc:creator>Adam Sommerfield</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-22T15:25:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: xp1024 rebuild disk</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp1024-rebuild-disk/m-p/4116468#M25704</link>
      <description>disk replacements are done by hp support folks.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 15:50:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/xp1024-rebuild-disk/m-p/4116468#M25704</guid>
      <dc:creator>Torsten.</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-22T15:50:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

