<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Command View Occupancy Reporting Discrepeancy in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/command-view-occupancy-reporting-discrepeancy/m-p/4140001#M26100</link>
    <description>Yes, a re-sync will temporarily clear the problem until the next time you delete/add a disk. Command View 7 permanently fixes this problem.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:20:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark Poeschl_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-05T18:20:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Command View Occupancy Reporting Discrepeancy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/command-view-occupancy-reporting-discrepeancy/m-p/4139999#M26098</link>
      <description>I'm running an EVA8000 with 12 shelves populated primarily with 300GB FC drives. The remaining diskss are 146GB FC which are being transitioned out. &lt;BR /&gt;As these are being transitioned out we've observed that one of the 2 groups is seriously 'mis'-reporting occupancy - to the order of 34 TB occupied of 27TB total available! &lt;BR /&gt;Now I know from reviewing Vdisks that actual occupancy is only about 10TB. I've been informed this is a 'feature' of CView 6.0.2 that when replacing with larger disks. We're currently running with XCS 6100.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The question is, does anyone know how to resolve the reporting discrepency in CView?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks en-avance&lt;BR /&gt;Jon</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:57:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/command-view-occupancy-reporting-discrepeancy/m-p/4139999#M26098</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohnnyB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-04T16:57:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Command View Occupancy Reporting Discrepeancy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/command-view-occupancy-reporting-discrepeancy/m-p/4140000#M26099</link>
      <description>Hi Jon,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There have been a couple of similar thread recently, one of which is here:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1097168" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1097168&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;These suggest that a resync. of the controllers should clear the problem.  This is something that a field service engineer will be able to do for you.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rob</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:47:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/command-view-occupancy-reporting-discrepeancy/m-p/4140000#M26099</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Leadbeater</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-04T19:47:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Command View Occupancy Reporting Discrepeancy</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/command-view-occupancy-reporting-discrepeancy/m-p/4140001#M26100</link>
      <description>Yes, a re-sync will temporarily clear the problem until the next time you delete/add a disk. Command View 7 permanently fixes this problem.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 18:20:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/command-view-occupancy-reporting-discrepeancy/m-p/4140001#M26100</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Poeschl_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-05T18:20:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

