<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MSA 60 Disk performance…. in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa-60-disk-performance/m-p/4141506#M26119</link>
    <description>I would like to find out the realistic throughput I can expect with a MSA 60, with 12-146GB drives (15K).   We have two attached to a DL580 G4 via Smart Array P800 controllers(2).  We are using RAID 1+0. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;With a 15k drive, would it be accurate to say it operates at 130 I/Os per sec, thus giving us 1560 I/Os per second with the MSA 60?   More or less than this?   &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any help on this would be appreciated.  &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mnitguy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-06T23:38:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MSA 60 Disk performance….</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa-60-disk-performance/m-p/4141506#M26119</link>
      <description>I would like to find out the realistic throughput I can expect with a MSA 60, with 12-146GB drives (15K).   We have two attached to a DL580 G4 via Smart Array P800 controllers(2).  We are using RAID 1+0. &lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;With a 15k drive, would it be accurate to say it operates at 130 I/Os per sec, thus giving us 1560 I/Os per second with the MSA 60?   More or less than this?   &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any help on this would be appreciated.  &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:38:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa-60-disk-performance/m-p/4141506#M26119</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mnitguy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-06T23:38:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

