<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Linux connectivity for EVA in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/linux-connectivity-for-eva/m-p/4152765#M26276</link>
    <description>I found following output at a customers SuSE SLES9-SP3 Proliant where a EVA6000 is connected with single HBA. Driver revision is 8.01.06.01, XCS6100 on EVA.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The scan with /opt/hp/hp_fibreutils/hp_rescan -a shows following:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;scsi1  00 00 00 HP  HSV200  6100  RAID&lt;BR /&gt;scsi1  00 00 01 HP  HSV200  6100  Direct-Access&lt;BR /&gt;scsi1  00 00 03 HP  HSV200  6100  Direct-Access&lt;BR /&gt;scsi1  00 01 00 HP  HSV200  6100  RAID&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I found in the Linux connectivity guide that "Direct-Access" is the right option, but why did I see two more entries with "RAID"? Is there something wrong with the multipathing?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bernd</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bernd Theobalt</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-29T02:06:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Linux connectivity for EVA</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/linux-connectivity-for-eva/m-p/4152765#M26276</link>
      <description>I found following output at a customers SuSE SLES9-SP3 Proliant where a EVA6000 is connected with single HBA. Driver revision is 8.01.06.01, XCS6100 on EVA.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The scan with /opt/hp/hp_fibreutils/hp_rescan -a shows following:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;scsi1  00 00 00 HP  HSV200  6100  RAID&lt;BR /&gt;scsi1  00 00 01 HP  HSV200  6100  Direct-Access&lt;BR /&gt;scsi1  00 00 03 HP  HSV200  6100  Direct-Access&lt;BR /&gt;scsi1  00 01 00 HP  HSV200  6100  RAID&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I found in the Linux connectivity guide that "Direct-Access" is the right option, but why did I see two more entries with "RAID"? Is there something wrong with the multipathing?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Bernd</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 02:06:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/linux-connectivity-for-eva/m-p/4152765#M26276</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bernd Theobalt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-29T02:06:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linux connectivity for EVA</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/linux-connectivity-for-eva/m-p/4152766#M26277</link>
      <description>It's the EVA's 'Storage Array Controller Device' which is mapped at LUN address 0 (it's the counterpart of the HSG's CCL in SCSI-3 mode). The SCSI device type is 12(10), not 0 like a normal disk device.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am sure you have overlooked that the first entry maps to target 0, LUN 0 and the last entry maps to target 1, LUN 0. No multipathing is done for this type of devices.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:24:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/linux-connectivity-for-eva/m-p/4152766#M26277</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-02-29T07:24:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

