<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: vxdump in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/vxdump/m-p/4216345#M27428</link>
    <description>I am not a big UNIX guy but the major difference is that VxDUMP works for VxFS, that means it's a filesystem based backup utility whereas "dd" is more versatile because it works at block level copy/backup mechanism. So dd will work universally but vxdump will only work with own file systems. Also, dd is there for many years and I believe dd doesn't have very good compression mechanism compare to others.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope that helps.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:10:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amar_Joshi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-06-13T14:10:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>vxdump</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/vxdump/m-p/4216344#M27427</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is the diff between vxdump and dd.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;atulkumar</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:29:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/vxdump/m-p/4216344#M27427</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prashanth Waugh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-13T13:29:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: vxdump</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/vxdump/m-p/4216345#M27428</link>
      <description>I am not a big UNIX guy but the major difference is that VxDUMP works for VxFS, that means it's a filesystem based backup utility whereas "dd" is more versatile because it works at block level copy/backup mechanism. So dd will work universally but vxdump will only work with own file systems. Also, dd is there for many years and I believe dd doesn't have very good compression mechanism compare to others.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope that helps.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 14:10:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/vxdump/m-p/4216345#M27428</guid>
      <dc:creator>Amar_Joshi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-06-13T14:10:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

