<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: array group in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/array-group/m-p/4349110#M29982</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;These configs are "physicaly" supported only for RAID10 on XPs (XP24k included):&lt;BR /&gt;2D+2D (4 physical disks) and 4D+4D (8 physical disks).</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:41:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>IBaltay</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-01T16:41:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>array group</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/array-group/m-p/4349109#M29981</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;is there any way to have in XP24k an array group of 10 disks configured for raid 10?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Amen</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:14:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/array-group/m-p/4349109#M29981</guid>
      <dc:creator>amin Tabarak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-01T16:14:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: array group</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/array-group/m-p/4349110#M29982</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;These configs are "physicaly" supported only for RAID10 on XPs (XP24k included):&lt;BR /&gt;2D+2D (4 physical disks) and 4D+4D (8 physical disks).</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:41:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/array-group/m-p/4349110#M29982</guid>
      <dc:creator>IBaltay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-01T16:41:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: array group</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/array-group/m-p/4349111#M29983</link>
      <description>You could use LUSE to aggregate multiple 2+2 group LDEVs.  On the XP24K with the optional Thin Provisioning you could have pools of 2+2 groups LDEVs in a pool to help provide an automatic stripe and mirror approach.  You can do 100% allocation so you don't have to worry about it being "Thin".</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:05:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/array-group/m-p/4349111#M29983</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ted Buis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-02T19:05:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: array group</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/array-group/m-p/4349112#M29984</link>
      <description>thanks guys,we will consider this in our implementation&lt;BR /&gt;best regards</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:37:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/array-group/m-p/4349112#M29984</guid>
      <dc:creator>amin Tabarak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-02T19:37:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: array group</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/array-group/m-p/4349113#M29985</link>
      <description>Prior to implementing LUSE you should be aware that it is a concatenation and not a stripe.  So performance id not great under certain conditions.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, I would highly recommend RAID10 4+4 instead of 2+2.  Theoretical performance for a single LDEV/LUN on 4+4 is 2 times better than that of 2+2.  The XP24K supports both, but most choose to implement 4+4.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Nigel</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:48:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/array-group/m-p/4349113#M29985</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nigel Poulton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-02T19:48:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

