<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EXPANDING ARRAY in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/expanding-array/m-p/4399465#M30853</link>
    <description>Never heard about such a problem. The current process might not even turn to a higher priority if the expansion code does not recheck the setting (I vague recall I've read such a claim for certain smartarray controllers some years ago)..</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-27T17:13:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EXPANDING ARRAY</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/expanding-array/m-p/4399463#M30851</link>
      <description>Hi all&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm an expanding array of disks, and in this process, but I realized that the priority is low, if I switch to high, I can lose the array data that is expanding?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:57:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/expanding-array/m-p/4399463#M30851</guid>
      <dc:creator>Xav0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-12T16:57:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EXPANDING ARRAY</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/expanding-array/m-p/4399464#M30852</link>
      <description>Yeah.. Its recommended not to change the priority when array is in rebuilding or expanding state</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:36:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/expanding-array/m-p/4399464#M30852</guid>
      <dc:creator>DSingh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-13T03:36:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EXPANDING ARRAY</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/expanding-array/m-p/4399465#M30853</link>
      <description>Never heard about such a problem. The current process might not even turn to a higher priority if the expansion code does not recheck the setting (I vague recall I've read such a claim for certain smartarray controllers some years ago)..</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:13:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/expanding-array/m-p/4399465#M30853</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-07-27T17:13:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

