<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Poor performance HP P400 controller in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544501#M33570</link>
    <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;for example who? I knew some guys who tried such a config, and all of them have performance problems like yours.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Patrick</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:19:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Patrick Terlisten</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-10T13:19:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Poor performance HP P400 controller</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544498#M33567</link>
      <description>&lt;!--!*#--&gt;Hi!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I use the HP P400 controller on a Asus P5M2/SAS motherboard with ESX 3.5. The diskperformance is really slow, only 8MB/SEC.. As you can see in the following configuation, I've got a backup battery attached and it's enabled. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any ideas why the performance is that bad?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;=&amp;gt; controller slot=1 show config detail&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Smart Array P400 in Slot 1&lt;BR /&gt;   Bus Interface: PCI&lt;BR /&gt;   Slot: 1&lt;BR /&gt;   Serial Number: PAFGK0M9VWJ3DJ&lt;BR /&gt;   Cache Serial Number: PA2270J9VWH0I9&lt;BR /&gt;   RAID 6 (ADG) Status: Enabled&lt;BR /&gt;   Controller Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;   Chassis Slot:&lt;BR /&gt;   Hardware Revision: Rev E&lt;BR /&gt;   Firmware Version: 5.26&lt;BR /&gt;   Rebuild Priority: High&lt;BR /&gt;   Expand Priority: High&lt;BR /&gt;   Surface Scan Delay: 15 sec&lt;BR /&gt;   Cache Board Present: True&lt;BR /&gt;   Cache Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;   Accelerator Ratio: 50% Read / 50% Write&lt;BR /&gt;   Drive Write Cache: Enabled&lt;BR /&gt;   Total Cache Size: 512 MB&lt;BR /&gt;   Battery Pack Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;   Battery Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;   SATA NCQ Supported: True&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   Array: A&lt;BR /&gt;      Interface Type: SATA&lt;BR /&gt;      Unused Space: 0 MB&lt;BR /&gt;      Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;      MultiDomain Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      Logical Drive: 1&lt;BR /&gt;         Size: 931.5 GB&lt;BR /&gt;         Fault Tolerance: RAID 1+0&lt;BR /&gt;         Heads: 255&lt;BR /&gt;         Sectors Per Track: 32&lt;BR /&gt;         Cylinders: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;         Stripe Size: 128 KB&lt;BR /&gt;         Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;         MultiDomain Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;         Array Accelerator: Enabled&lt;BR /&gt;         Unique Identifier: 600508B100104D3956574A33444A0002&lt;BR /&gt;         Disk Name: /dev/cciss/c0d0&lt;BR /&gt;         Mount Points: None&lt;BR /&gt;         Logical Drive Label: A0100588PAFGK0M9VWJ3DJ15E7&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      physicaldrive 0:0&lt;BR /&gt;         Box: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Bay: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Active Path:&lt;BR /&gt;            Port: 2I Box: 0 Bay: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;         Drive Type: Data Drive&lt;BR /&gt;         Interface Type: SATA&lt;BR /&gt;         Size: 1000.2 GB&lt;BR /&gt;         Firmware Revision: 1AA01113&lt;BR /&gt;         Serial Number: S13PJ1MS200883&lt;BR /&gt;         Model: ATA     SAMSUNG HD103UJ&lt;BR /&gt;         SATA NCQ Capable: True&lt;BR /&gt;         SATA NCQ Enabled: True&lt;BR /&gt;         PHY Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;         PHY Transfer Rate: 1.5GBPS&lt;BR /&gt;      physicaldrive 0:0&lt;BR /&gt;         Box: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Bay: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Active Path:&lt;BR /&gt;            Port: 2I Box: 0 Bay: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;         Drive Type: Data Drive&lt;BR /&gt;         Interface Type: SATA&lt;BR /&gt;         Size: 1000.2 GB&lt;BR /&gt;         Firmware Revision: 1AA01113&lt;BR /&gt;         Serial Number: S13PJ1MS200883&lt;BR /&gt;         Model: ATA     SAMSUNG HD103UJ&lt;BR /&gt;         SATA NCQ Capable: True&lt;BR /&gt;         SATA NCQ Enabled: True&lt;BR /&gt;         PHY Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;         PHY Transfer Rate: 1.5GBPS&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;   Array: B&lt;BR /&gt;      Interface Type: SATA&lt;BR /&gt;      Unused Space: 305213 MB&lt;BR /&gt;      Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;      MultiDomain Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      Logical Drive: 2&lt;BR /&gt;         Size: 298.1 GB&lt;BR /&gt;         Fault Tolerance: RAID 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Heads: 255&lt;BR /&gt;         Sectors Per Track: 32&lt;BR /&gt;         Cylinders: 65535&lt;BR /&gt;         Stripe Size: 64 KB&lt;BR /&gt;         Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;         MultiDomain Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;         Array Accelerator: Enabled&lt;BR /&gt;         Unique Identifier: 600508B100104D3956574A33444A0005&lt;BR /&gt;         Disk Name: /dev/cciss/c0d1&lt;BR /&gt;         Mount Points: None&lt;BR /&gt;         Logical Drive Label: A359814EPAFGK0M9VWJ3DJDD38&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      physicaldrive 0:0&lt;BR /&gt;         Box: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Bay: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Active Path:&lt;BR /&gt;            Port: 2I Box: 0 Bay: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;         Drive Type: Data Drive&lt;BR /&gt;         Interface Type: SATA&lt;BR /&gt;         Size: 320.0 GB&lt;BR /&gt;         Firmware Revision: 21.00M21&lt;BR /&gt;         Serial Number:      WD-WCAPD4215865&lt;BR /&gt;         Model: ATA     WDC WD3200YS-01P&lt;BR /&gt;         SATA NCQ Capable: True&lt;BR /&gt;         SATA NCQ Enabled: True&lt;BR /&gt;         PHY Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;         PHY Transfer Rate: 1.5GBPS&lt;BR /&gt;      physicaldrive 0:0&lt;BR /&gt;         Box: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Bay: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Active Path:&lt;BR /&gt;            Port: 2I Box: 0 Bay: 0&lt;BR /&gt;         Status: OK&lt;BR /&gt;         Drive Type: Data Drive&lt;BR /&gt;         Interface Type: SATA&lt;BR /&gt;         Size: 320.0 GB&lt;BR /&gt;         Firmware Revision: 21.00M21&lt;BR /&gt;         Serial Number:      WD-WCAPD4215865&lt;BR /&gt;         Model: ATA     WDC WD3200YS-01P&lt;BR /&gt;         SATA NCQ Capable: True&lt;BR /&gt;         SATA NCQ Enabled: True&lt;BR /&gt;         PHY Count: 1&lt;BR /&gt;         PHY Transfer Rate: 1.5GBPS&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544498#M33567</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeroentjuhh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-04T14:30:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor performance HP P400 controller</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544499#M33568</link>
      <description>As i can see (correct me if i'm wrong) you are trying to use P400 controller on unsupported server and even with unsupported disks. In this configuration no one can guarantee you even that it will just work - disregard performance.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544499#M33568</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prokopets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-10T12:06:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor performance HP P400 controller</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544500#M33569</link>
      <description>True..&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But there are many people who are running the same configuration with a proper performance.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544500#M33569</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeroentjuhh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-10T12:12:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor performance HP P400 controller</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544501#M33570</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;for example who? I knew some guys who tried such a config, and all of them have performance problems like yours.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Patrick</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:19:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544501#M33570</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Terlisten</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-10T13:19:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor performance HP P400 controller</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544502#M33571</link>
      <description>&amp;gt; But there are many people &lt;BR /&gt;Where?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Did you install all the drivers for this motherboard, specifically for the MB chipset and the P400? Not all drivers are available for ESX (linux) or even if they install they may not be the most appropriate ones for the hardware.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I tried an E200 once in a home winXP desktop and had poor performance too.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:25:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544502#M33571</guid>
      <dc:creator>TTr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-10T13:25:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor performance HP P400 controller</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544503#M33572</link>
      <description>Like:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://virtualfuture.info/2009/02/esx-whitebox-local-storage-perfomance-tip/" target="_blank"&gt;http://virtualfuture.info/2009/02/esx-whitebox-local-storage-perfomance-tip/&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://forums.openfiler.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17349#p17349" target="_blank"&gt;https://forums.openfiler.com/viewtopic.php?pid=17349#p17349&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.vmprofessional.com/index.php?content=about" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.vmprofessional.com/index.php?content=about&lt;/A&gt; (Personal System)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;etc etc..</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:35:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544503#M33572</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeroentjuhh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-10T13:35:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor performance HP P400 controller</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544504#M33573</link>
      <description>Well... I can say only one thing - the behavior of unsupported hardware configuration is absolutely unpredictable because of too many points of indefiniteness. Sad but true.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:53:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544504#M33573</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prokopets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-10T16:53:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Poor performance HP P400 controller</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544505#M33574</link>
      <description>Indeed sad.. But are there other options re. this controller and drives?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:38:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/poor-performance-hp-p400-controller/m-p/4544505#M33574</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeroentjuhh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-14T11:38:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

