<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic LUN size for VM ... in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/lun-size-for-vm/m-p/4554644#M33747</link>
    <description>Hi All ,&lt;BR /&gt;I have a XP10000 ,which has 300 GB disk in RAID 5 (3D+1P) config .I looking for best practices to allocate LUNs to VMware ESX server .Should I allocate a single larger LUN (600 -700 GB ) to ESX ,which in tirn will be used to create 5 VMs ,though this way all IOPS will be services by the same RAID group  OR should I give smaller LUNs from 2 or 3 RAID groups so as to distribute the IOPS between them ? &lt;BR /&gt;Kindly help .....</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:11:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>avamar11</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-23T10:11:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LUN size for VM ...</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/lun-size-for-vm/m-p/4554644#M33747</link>
      <description>Hi All ,&lt;BR /&gt;I have a XP10000 ,which has 300 GB disk in RAID 5 (3D+1P) config .I looking for best practices to allocate LUNs to VMware ESX server .Should I allocate a single larger LUN (600 -700 GB ) to ESX ,which in tirn will be used to create 5 VMs ,though this way all IOPS will be services by the same RAID group  OR should I give smaller LUNs from 2 or 3 RAID groups so as to distribute the IOPS between them ? &lt;BR /&gt;Kindly help .....</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:11:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/lun-size-for-vm/m-p/4554644#M33747</guid>
      <dc:creator>avamar11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-23T10:11:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LUN size for VM ...</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/lun-size-for-vm/m-p/4554645#M33748</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;a LUN size between 500 GB an 1 TB is perfect. You should distribute them across the raid groups. VMFS filesystems with a high load shouldn't reside on the same raid group. VMs with a high load shouldn't reside in the same VMFS.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;VMware recommend not more then 12 to 15 VMs per VMFS, not more then 10 ESX servers per LUN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Best regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Patrick</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:41:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/lun-size-for-vm/m-p/4554645#M33748</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick Terlisten</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-23T10:41:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: LUN size for VM ...</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/lun-size-for-vm/m-p/4554646#M33749</link>
      <description>Can some elaborate more ,like effect on RAID 5 ( 3d+1P or 7D+1P) ...does any one also some info about Oracle VM ...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:46:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/lun-size-for-vm/m-p/4554646#M33749</guid>
      <dc:creator>avamar11</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-23T10:46:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

