<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic MSA2324 vDISK Recommendations in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa2324-vdisk-recommendations/m-p/4643449#M35178</link>
    <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have a new MSA2000 (2324FC G2)with 24 300Gb SAS disks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've read the "best practice" information from the HP site. I'm happy enough with the notion of (evenly) spreading the vdisks and physical disks between the two controller; and avoiding creating lots of ridiculously small vdisks (to avoid wasting space). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, I still have some questions over the best (general) way to set up the beast.I say "general" because I don't need to wring out every last possible ounce of performance or space. Unfortunately, the "Best Practice" guide really left more questions than it answered.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The array is connected to redundant SAN fabric switches; will be accessed simultaneously by around 6 - 10 hosts (with varying workloads) and  I would imagine that each vdisk would need to have multiple volumes mapped to these various hosts.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I appreciate it is difficult to give specific advice but in general terms:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;a) Are there are sweet-spots when it comes to sizing vdisks e.g. an optimal number of disks in a RAID-5 set?&lt;BR /&gt;b) From a performance point of view would it be better to have two large vdisks (12 disks each), or four slightly smaller vdisks (6 disk each). (NB: For the sake of argument I'm ignoring the need for hot spares).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks for any help or advice.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mark&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MCurtis_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-07T10:04:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MSA2324 vDISK Recommendations</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa2324-vdisk-recommendations/m-p/4643449#M35178</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We have a new MSA2000 (2324FC G2)with 24 300Gb SAS disks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've read the "best practice" information from the HP site. I'm happy enough with the notion of (evenly) spreading the vdisks and physical disks between the two controller; and avoiding creating lots of ridiculously small vdisks (to avoid wasting space). &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, I still have some questions over the best (general) way to set up the beast.I say "general" because I don't need to wring out every last possible ounce of performance or space. Unfortunately, the "Best Practice" guide really left more questions than it answered.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The array is connected to redundant SAN fabric switches; will be accessed simultaneously by around 6 - 10 hosts (with varying workloads) and  I would imagine that each vdisk would need to have multiple volumes mapped to these various hosts.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I appreciate it is difficult to give specific advice but in general terms:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;a) Are there are sweet-spots when it comes to sizing vdisks e.g. an optimal number of disks in a RAID-5 set?&lt;BR /&gt;b) From a performance point of view would it be better to have two large vdisks (12 disks each), or four slightly smaller vdisks (6 disk each). (NB: For the sake of argument I'm ignoring the need for hot spares).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks for any help or advice.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Mark&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa2324-vdisk-recommendations/m-p/4643449#M35178</guid>
      <dc:creator>MCurtis_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-07T10:04:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSA2324 vDISK Recommendations</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa2324-vdisk-recommendations/m-p/4643450#M35179</link>
      <description>a) As for me, it's not a good idea to use raid-5 with more than 10 disks. Just because of a probability of two disk failure. If you have a hot-spare disk the risk is quite lower.&lt;BR /&gt;b) it depends :). Look, your OS LVM can be faster than MSA controller when it manages two LUNs, or can be slower, i think, it's unpredictable. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I think, that it's better to give up a theoretical discussion and just make some tests with iometer - it will give you much more adequate answer.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:04:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/msa2324-vdisk-recommendations/m-p/4643450#M35179</guid>
      <dc:creator>Prokopets</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-08T14:04:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

