<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EVA 4100 in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686893#M35845</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The disk protection level doesn't give you any more redundancy.  It simply reserves more space within the group which is used in case disks fail.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In an EVA data for all vdisks is distributed across all physical disks in the group.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Assuming all the shelves in your EVA are populated, you'll have 42 disks which will probably be split into 5 RSS groups.  The EVA tries to keep RSS groups to an optimum size of 8 disks, so you'll possibly have 4 RSS groups with 8 disks and 1 of 10 disks - the exact layout may be different depending on how disks have failed in the past.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As mentioned in a previous reply, if two disks within the same RSS group fail, then you'll lose any Vraid-5 vdisks.  If two disks that are paired within the same RSS group fail, then you'll lose any Vraid-1 vdisks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So in the worst case, two disks fail and you could lose everything.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In the best case, 5 disks (one from each RSS group) could fail and everything would carry out on working fine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That is why the best practice is always to replace disks as soon as you can after they fail, because no-one can predict which disk is going to fail next...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rob</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:48:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rob Leadbeater</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-15T19:48:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EVA 4100</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686889#M35841</link>
      <description>Hi &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a EVA4100 2C3D. I have a doubt about the EVA. we have all the disks configured in the default disk group.we have vdisks with raid 1 and raid 5. how are the vdisks assigned on the physical disks and how many disk failure on the EVA will cause data loss.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:48:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686889#M35841</guid>
      <dc:creator>AIG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-15T09:48:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA 4100</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686890#M35842</link>
      <description>It depends of your RSS map. All vdisk redundancy is contained within a RSS set. If you lose one disk you will lose all VRAID 0 vdisks. If you lose two disks within a RSS you will lose your VRAID 5 data. If the disks are in pair you will lose your VRAID 1 data too.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Greetings&lt;BR /&gt;Oscar&lt;BR /&gt;(&lt;A href="http://oscarmaimo.blogspot.com)" target="_blank"&gt;http://oscarmaimo.blogspot.com)&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:56:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686890#M35842</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oscar_Maimó</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-15T11:56:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA 4100</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686891#M35843</link>
      <description>what is the disk protection level(single or double) you have set on the disk group?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 12:30:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686891#M35843</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnthonySN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-15T12:30:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA 4100</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686892#M35844</link>
      <description>we have set it to double</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:58:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686892#M35844</guid>
      <dc:creator>AIG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-15T14:58:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA 4100</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686893#M35845</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The disk protection level doesn't give you any more redundancy.  It simply reserves more space within the group which is used in case disks fail.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In an EVA data for all vdisks is distributed across all physical disks in the group.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Assuming all the shelves in your EVA are populated, you'll have 42 disks which will probably be split into 5 RSS groups.  The EVA tries to keep RSS groups to an optimum size of 8 disks, so you'll possibly have 4 RSS groups with 8 disks and 1 of 10 disks - the exact layout may be different depending on how disks have failed in the past.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As mentioned in a previous reply, if two disks within the same RSS group fail, then you'll lose any Vraid-5 vdisks.  If two disks that are paired within the same RSS group fail, then you'll lose any Vraid-1 vdisks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So in the worst case, two disks fail and you could lose everything.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In the best case, 5 disks (one from each RSS group) could fail and everything would carry out on working fine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That is why the best practice is always to replace disks as soon as you can after they fail, because no-one can predict which disk is going to fail next...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Rob</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:48:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686893#M35845</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rob Leadbeater</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-15T19:48:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA 4100</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686894#M35846</link>
      <description>Rob:&lt;BR /&gt;When you said:&lt;BR /&gt;"In the best case, 5 disks (one from each RSS group) could fail and everything would carry out on working fine."&lt;BR /&gt;You must take into account the free space needed in Disk Group for reconstruction. In this case the spare and free space comes to play.&lt;BR /&gt;Greetings&lt;BR /&gt;Oscar</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:09:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-4100/m-p/4686894#M35846</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oscar_Maimó</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-16T12:09:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

