<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MPIO ALB Performance in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mpio-alb-performance/m-p/4702221#M36096</link>
    <description>Thanks for the reply.&lt;BR /&gt;I've got about 25 LUNs in total so far with more migrations on the way. Load for these LUNs is distributed amongst the 2 controllers, however, all LUNs belonging to a particular system are assigned to the same controller. In the case of the SQL server, it has 5 LUNs. The overall controller utilization is pretty low (&amp;lt;20%) and performance analysis of the server shows only 1 LUN to be active (the one that the job is reading from).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would distributing the controller LUN ownership still matter much in my case?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why does enabling the ALB have such a significant negative performance impact?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:08:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dataerror</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-10-20T19:08:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MPIO ALB Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mpio-alb-performance/m-p/4702219#M36094</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;During testing of my EVA4400, I noticed that when I enabled ALB in MPIO, it increased read performance significantly.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am aware the ALB basically allows for the owning controller to handle all of the reads to the LUN.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In practice however, I have a SQL server that had a stuck job that was consistently performing reads. As a test, I enabled ALB and noticed that controller utilization went down, but so did the read perfrormance. Fom about 90 MB/s to 50MB/s.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this expected? As a 'best practice' should ALB be enabled?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mpio-alb-performance/m-p/4702219#M36094</guid>
      <dc:creator>dataerror</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-20T14:16:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPIO ALB Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mpio-alb-performance/m-p/4702220#M36095</link>
      <description>What is the layout of your LUNS?&lt;BR /&gt;How many LUNs are assigned to the very SQL server?&lt;BR /&gt;If you have several LUNs all owned by one controller this could be the reason. &lt;BR /&gt;Try distributing the LUNs to both controllers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:58:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mpio-alb-performance/m-p/4702220#M36095</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Mattei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-20T17:58:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPIO ALB Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mpio-alb-performance/m-p/4702221#M36096</link>
      <description>Thanks for the reply.&lt;BR /&gt;I've got about 25 LUNs in total so far with more migrations on the way. Load for these LUNs is distributed amongst the 2 controllers, however, all LUNs belonging to a particular system are assigned to the same controller. In the case of the SQL server, it has 5 LUNs. The overall controller utilization is pretty low (&amp;lt;20%) and performance analysis of the server shows only 1 LUN to be active (the one that the job is reading from).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Would distributing the controller LUN ownership still matter much in my case?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why does enabling the ALB have such a significant negative performance impact?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:08:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mpio-alb-performance/m-p/4702221#M36096</guid>
      <dc:creator>dataerror</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-20T19:08:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MPIO ALB Performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mpio-alb-performance/m-p/4702222#M36097</link>
      <description>This is strange indeed.&lt;BR /&gt;If you are just reading from one LUN without other traffic going on I would expect better performance with ALB=on.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you verify that the IO is really going through the LUN owning controller only?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try moving the LUN to the other controller anyway to see if the behaviour stays the same. If not it could be a SAN issue. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Pete</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mpio-alb-performance/m-p/4702222#M36097</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Mattei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-10-21T06:49:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

