<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Mod 20 mixed memory in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mod-20-mixed-memory/m-p/2459954#M374</link>
    <description>Thanks Bob Inglis. I agree that mixing  60 and 70 nansecond memory may not be a good thing but does HP specifically say so and where. The reason I ask is that I have found in new memory pairs from HP have both 60 and 70' mixed and 1 part number. Perhaps this is a needed correction. Lacking any formal direction from HP I must assume that their mixing of memory pair's based on speed is supportable.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Again Thanks for any info you can provide</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Paul Allen_10</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2000-10-31T17:30:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mod 20 mixed memory</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mod-20-mixed-memory/m-p/2459954#M374</link>
      <description>Thanks Bob Inglis. I agree that mixing  60 and 70 nansecond memory may not be a good thing but does HP specifically say so and where. The reason I ask is that I have found in new memory pairs from HP have both 60 and 70' mixed and 1 part number. Perhaps this is a needed correction. Lacking any formal direction from HP I must assume that their mixing of memory pair's based on speed is supportable.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Again Thanks for any info you can provide</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/mod-20-mixed-memory/m-p/2459954#M374</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paul Allen_10</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-10-31T17:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

