<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Arraydsp -m vs TFM description in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/arraydsp-m-vs-tfm-description/m-p/4843759#M38159</link>
    <description>Ooops!   Sorry about that previous blank post.  It's that nadvertant elbow...or perhaps too much coffee!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My question is about the manual and man pages which refer to column 5 on arraydsp -m as Disk Queue, yet the 12H and 11.x generate a fifth column of SCSI Q.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a difference?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, the values I get are between 23 and 64, far higher than the manual's suggested typical amounts of 2-4.  Yet nothing else in the other values (cache util, cache queue, etc) appears out of the unusual, and arraydsp -r has nothing to suggest.  I do get disk alerts on one VG/LV which happens to be the database.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any ideas on the above two questions?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;TIA!!!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Doug</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2000 22:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Doug_3</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2000-08-22T22:20:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Arraydsp -m vs TFM description</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/arraydsp-m-vs-tfm-description/m-p/4843759#M38159</link>
      <description>Ooops!   Sorry about that previous blank post.  It's that nadvertant elbow...or perhaps too much coffee!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My question is about the manual and man pages which refer to column 5 on arraydsp -m as Disk Queue, yet the 12H and 11.x generate a fifth column of SCSI Q.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there a difference?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also, the values I get are between 23 and 64, far higher than the manual's suggested typical amounts of 2-4.  Yet nothing else in the other values (cache util, cache queue, etc) appears out of the unusual, and arraydsp -r has nothing to suggest.  I do get disk alerts on one VG/LV which happens to be the database.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any ideas on the above two questions?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;TIA!!!!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Doug</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2000 22:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/arraydsp-m-vs-tfm-description/m-p/4843759#M38159</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doug_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-08-22T22:20:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arraydsp -m vs TFM description</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/arraydsp-m-vs-tfm-description/m-p/4843760#M38160</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I seem to get the same resulsts with the 12H (and Oracle) as you. You don't give the configuration for your 12H, but with 6 disks my SCSI Queue is regularly up around a 100, it should not be higher than around 30. This queue-load listed is the internal dual SCSI-queue and not the wide-diff. queue running to the HPUX afaik.&lt;BR /&gt;I have switched the Resiliency Setting to High Performance and that changed things a lot but I switched it back to normal to be on the safe side. However, even with the high queue-loads, I don't get complaints from users so I don't worry too much.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/arraydsp-m-vs-tfm-description/m-p/4843760#M38160</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maarten van Maanen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-08-23T09:01:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arraydsp -m vs TFM description</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/arraydsp-m-vs-tfm-description/m-p/4843761#M38161</link>
      <description>Check these links:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.hp.com/essd/model12H_writews.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.hp.com/essd/model12H_writews.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.enterprisestorage.hp.com/pdfs/idc_autoraid.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.enterprisestorage.hp.com/pdfs/idc_autoraid.pdf&lt;/A&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/arraydsp-m-vs-tfm-description/m-p/4843761#M38161</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS_ANORUO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-08-23T09:44:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arraydsp -m vs TFM description</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/arraydsp-m-vs-tfm-description/m-p/4843762#M38162</link>
      <description>Doug:&lt;BR /&gt;The SCSI Queue is referring to the queue for the internal disks...it is the same.  &lt;BR /&gt;Also the users guide is incorrect and the values for this parameter should be:&lt;BR /&gt;Array not in use = 0&lt;BR /&gt;Desired range = 0-50&lt;BR /&gt;Performance problems = &amp;gt;50&lt;BR /&gt;and the description of this metric is:&lt;BR /&gt;"Indicates the average number of transactions waiting in the internal disk SCSI queues.  Too many commands in the queues decrease performance."</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2000 03:32:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/arraydsp-m-vs-tfm-description/m-p/4843762#M38162</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nelson Broskey_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-08-24T03:32:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Arraydsp -m vs TFM description</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/arraydsp-m-vs-tfm-description/m-p/4843763#M38163</link>
      <description>thank you.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:46:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/arraydsp-m-vs-tfm-description/m-p/4843763#M38163</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doug_3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-04-30T20:46:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

