<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SecurePath for EVA3000 in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/securepath-for-eva3000/m-p/4880108#M38567</link>
    <description>Hi Tuan.&lt;BR /&gt;Secure Path can not do load balancing between 2 Controllers. EVA3000 allow to config One controller per VDISK (LUN) and fail over to other controller. secure path not support for "fail back mode" of controller.&lt;BR /&gt;Secure path support load balancing on Fabric only (From HBAs &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; Fabric&amp;lt;-&amp;gt; one controller ).&lt;BR /&gt;That all.&lt;BR /&gt;tienna</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:24:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nguyen Anh Tien</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-01-15T00:24:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SecurePath for EVA3000</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/securepath-for-eva3000/m-p/4880105#M38564</link>
      <description>Hi All,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't know much about SecurePath. I've just configurated SecurePath for server rp3440 and EVA3000 and set load balancing function.&lt;BR /&gt;When I use command #spmgr display to display how it work, I realize it load balancing on F/C link from server (2 ports) to SAN switch and on only one Controller with 2 F/C port.&lt;BR /&gt;Can SecurePath do load balancing between 2 Controllers, it mean that all 2 Controllers is simultaneously active. If it have, how I should do?&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advanced&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HMT</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/securepath-for-eva3000/m-p/4880105#M38564</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hoang Minh Tuan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-14T05:28:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SecurePath for EVA3000</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/securepath-for-eva3000/m-p/4880106#M38565</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;The EVA controllers are not active-active.&lt;BR /&gt;You always have one active and one passive controllers, so no load balancing is possible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This feature is implememted in the XP and VA disk arrays, but not in COMPAQ'S EVA's.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That's one of the reasons I personally do not count an EVA as an alternative for the VA.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Regards&lt;BR /&gt;Rainer&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:43:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/securepath-for-eva3000/m-p/4880106#M38565</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rainer von Bongartz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-14T05:43:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SecurePath for EVA3000</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/securepath-for-eva3000/m-p/4880107#M38566</link>
      <description>Sorry, but that is not correct - you are trying to transfer your definition of active/active into a different world.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The EVA controllers are Active/Active, because you can divide different virtual disks over both controllers and they will both serve I/Os. What is true is that you can't do I/O to a single virtual disk through both controllers, because only one controller manages a virtual disk at a time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The VA works a bit different. A single controller is responsible for an entire redundancy group with all LUNs it holds. If you attempt to do I/O through the other controller, he will re-route the request through the internal bus so the controller owning the RG does the disk I/O.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;See the discussion of "Performance Path" on page 45 in the User and Service Guide (A6183-96007, March 2004).</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:58:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/securepath-for-eva3000/m-p/4880107#M38566</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-14T06:58:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SecurePath for EVA3000</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/securepath-for-eva3000/m-p/4880108#M38567</link>
      <description>Hi Tuan.&lt;BR /&gt;Secure Path can not do load balancing between 2 Controllers. EVA3000 allow to config One controller per VDISK (LUN) and fail over to other controller. secure path not support for "fail back mode" of controller.&lt;BR /&gt;Secure path support load balancing on Fabric only (From HBAs &amp;lt;-&amp;gt; Fabric&amp;lt;-&amp;gt; one controller ).&lt;BR /&gt;That all.&lt;BR /&gt;tienna</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:24:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/securepath-for-eva3000/m-p/4880108#M38567</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nguyen Anh Tien</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-15T00:24:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SecurePath for EVA3000</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/securepath-for-eva3000/m-p/4880109#M38568</link>
      <description>Thanks all,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;All of your information make my attitude more clearly. &lt;BR /&gt;To Tien: SP not only can set fail over, but also can be a fail back mode (I'm sure?)&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2005 23:22:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/securepath-for-eva3000/m-p/4880109#M38568</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hoang Minh Tuan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-01-16T23:22:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

