<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Disk utilization problem in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150489#M42773</link>
    <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sorry I was mistaken, I/O's were not distributed equally on my case to the HBA's, I have distributed them equally, problem solved.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for all&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Yazan Yacoub</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-01-22T10:01:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Disk utilization problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150482#M42766</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;when I do sar -d 5 5 | grep (diskx) i got the following result:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Diskx 100    31.3     828  332849 0.0    37.8&lt;BR /&gt;Diskx 100    27.2    1133  270135 0.0    24.0&lt;BR /&gt;Diskx 100    28.1     929  317121 0.0    30.2&lt;BR /&gt;Diskx 100    31.9    1031  314083 0.0    30.9&lt;BR /&gt;Diskx 100    26.1     826  271291 0.0    31.6&lt;BR /&gt;Diskx 100    28.9     949  301095 0.0    30.4&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1-System is connected to two EVA's with 2HBAs, &lt;BR /&gt;2-this server is running oracle database.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sar -u 5 5 result:&lt;BR /&gt;14:54:16    %usr    %sys    %wio   %idle&lt;BR /&gt;14:54:21      46      17      28       9&lt;BR /&gt;14:54:26      46      15      29      11&lt;BR /&gt;14:54:31      60      17      17       6&lt;BR /&gt;14:54:36      51      15      23      10&lt;BR /&gt;14:54:41      41      14      25      19&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Average       49      15      25      11&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sar -b 5 5 result:&lt;BR /&gt;14:55:06 bread/s lread/s %rcache bwrit/s lwrit/s %wcache pread/s pwrit/s&lt;BR /&gt;14:55:11       2   19435     100       3     181      98       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;14:55:16       0   19614     100       4     932     100       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;14:55:21       1   34755     100       3   12764     100       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;14:55:26       0   41725     100      18   13709     100       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;14:55:31       0   41150     100       5   14143     100       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Average        1   31340     100       7    8348     100       0       0&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have checked the HBA's and no bottleneck found, and I checked Storage controller, and no singe of bottlenecks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please advice,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:57:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150482#M42766</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yazan Yacoub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-14T10:57:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Disk utilization problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150483#M42767</link>
      <description>Don't worry about the 100% utilisation number - that just means the disk was doing something for the entire interval of measurement (a good thing!)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;WHat is concerning is the q length (queued IOs) and the service time (30ms is *not* good for an EVA). Also note that for the blk/s column were' seeing up to 332849 blocks per second (a block being 512 bytes). That works out at about 160MB/s - quite a high IO rate.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;QUestions:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) WHat OS version?&lt;BR /&gt;2) What is on that LUN? What are you doing to generate this amount of IO?&lt;BR /&gt;3) What generation of EVA? Any MPIO software?&lt;BR /&gt;4) Any logical volume configuration in the mix?&lt;BR /&gt;5) IS the EVA LUN replicated using Continuous Acess?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Duncan</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150483#M42767</guid>
      <dc:creator>Duncan Edmonstone</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-14T11:16:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Disk utilization problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150484#M42768</link>
      <description>Many thanks for your reply,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;But I am little bit confused, since I am not able to find bottleneck from HBA side, and thats mean no high IO rate on HBA, is my problem on OS level ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I will send the the info as soon as possible since I am not the system admin, but what I know its running Oracle Database and we have 2 EVAs5000 hosting the LUNs, &lt;BR /&gt;EVA is not replicated.&lt;BR /&gt;Many thanks,</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:03:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150484#M42768</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yazan Yacoub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-14T13:03:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Disk utilization problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150485#M42769</link>
      <description>Yes, please give us some info, hp-ux version, release, virtual machine?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Have a look at what it's on that disk,is it a oracle .dbf? :&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;pvdisplay /dev/dsk/diskx&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;and have a look what lvols are on the disk.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Then go and talk to your dba admins and check what tablespaces they have on those .dbf and why they are burning them to death.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:13:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150485#M42769</guid>
      <dc:creator>likid0</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-14T14:13:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Disk utilization problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150486#M42770</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I got required information, but you will not be happy HP gurus :)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Its Solaris 9 machine&lt;BR /&gt;with Solaris volume manager running on it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any ideas ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 03:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150486#M42770</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yazan Yacoub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-15T03:33:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Disk utilization problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150487#M42771</link>
      <description>from your output sar -d. the average service time is high and busy is 100%. it's mean that all disks used by database. maybe you can add hba to server or add port in storage.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 05:53:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150487#M42771</guid>
      <dc:creator>yulianto piyut</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-15T05:53:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Disk utilization problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150488#M42772</link>
      <description>Bonjour,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You said "and I checked Storage controller, and no singe of bottlenecks.". &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Though I don't know anything about Solaris, I guess that sar outputs have about the same meanings than in other unix. So I don't agree with your postulate that there is no bottleneck at EVA side : queue permanently above 26, large sustained amount of IO around 1000, 150 Mo/s which is a heavy load, and a delay at around 30ms from storage and 0 from unix side ...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You should go back to EVA management team and ask them to analyze some things like % of cpu used by controlers, efficiency of cache, loadbalance between controllers, IO rate related to number of physical disks, etc ...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And what are you doing to this poor storage array ? Backup (large bloc size around 150 Ko) ? If yes maybe the situation is not so serious.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Eric</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 06:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150488#M42772</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric SAUBIGNAC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-15T06:43:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Disk utilization problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150489#M42773</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sorry I was mistaken, I/O's were not distributed equally on my case to the HBA's, I have distributed them equally, problem solved.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for all&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150489#M42773</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yazan Yacoub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-22T10:01:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Disk utilization problem</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150490#M42774</link>
      <description>see above</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:03:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/disk-utilization-problem/m-p/5150490#M42774</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yazan Yacoub</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-01-22T10:03:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

