<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: EVA and Oracle Databases. in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159659#M42874</link>
    <description>Thankyou IBaltay&lt;BR /&gt;hp os is 11.31 , setting up multipathing manually is ruled out,Oracle version will be &lt;BR /&gt;10.2.0.7.expecting more views!! thanks once agian</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:41:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DeafFrog</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-26T09:41:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>EVA and Oracle Databases.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159657#M42872</link>
      <description>As i understand , EVA have inbuild "V-Raid" ,would like to know &lt;BR /&gt;-if it's a OK to assign a single big LUN , say of 280G ,create a single Vg , and create LVs  to contain all Database FS ( indexes , redolog , archive ,datafiles ..etc).We are using Vraid 1 , and EVA 8K is configured in 2C2D configuration.Some ppl. will suggest that in vraid striping and mirroring are taken care of and we need not worry about db block size etc .&lt;BR /&gt;-could you please share you experience with database(Oracle on EVA).&lt;BR /&gt;-we are expecting good number of hits to Database.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 05:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159657#M42872</guid>
      <dc:creator>DeafFrog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-26T05:15:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA and Oracle Databases.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159658#M42873</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;the general best practices is using the EVA LUNs/LVM as follows:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;redo logs  RAID1, each as a separate  EVA LUN&lt;BR /&gt;archive logs RAID1, each as a separate EVA LUN&lt;BR /&gt;redo log/archive logs mirrors on a separate EVA Luns&lt;BR /&gt;datafiles RAID5 nicely balanced according to the number of the front ports/host hbas, etc.,&lt;BR /&gt;e.g. 4 smaller LUNs, 8 smaller LUNs for LVM,...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also it is a good practice in HPUX before 11.31 to evenly set preferred path to controller a,b (failover, failback) on the eva controllers during the vdisk presentation&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:18:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159658#M42873</guid>
      <dc:creator>IBaltay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-26T09:18:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA and Oracle Databases.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159659#M42874</link>
      <description>Thankyou IBaltay&lt;BR /&gt;hp os is 11.31 , setting up multipathing manually is ruled out,Oracle version will be &lt;BR /&gt;10.2.0.7.expecting more views!! thanks once agian</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:41:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159659#M42874</guid>
      <dc:creator>DeafFrog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-26T09:41:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA and Oracle Databases.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159660#M42875</link>
      <description>&amp;gt; setting up multipathing manually is ruled out&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't know if 11.31 understands ALUA (asymmetrical logical unit access) - if not, you better DO manual optimizations or all virtual disks can end up on one EVA controller over time.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Oh, I just see you have a 2C2D - well, it should not be that bad on such a small box...</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:51:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159660#M42875</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-26T19:51:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA and Oracle Databases.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159661#M42876</link>
      <description>"the general best practices is using the EVA LUNs/LVM as follows"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;@IBaltay &lt;BR /&gt;is it best practise according ORACLE or HP?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have configured LUNs for my databases almost just the same way (just archived redologs I've put on R5 - log switch once in 20min or so can R5 handle pretty fine, I think) but unfortunately time to time I'm reaching throughput capacity limits on EVA8k controler's internal mirror ports. storage vendor (after discussion with HP) tries to persuade me to change R5 to R10 because R10, allegedly, should generate less internal traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I do not incline to such a change due to several reasons.&lt;BR /&gt;Do you have a link to any officially released best practice document (preferably from HP) according topic? If you could share it I would appreciate it.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;emha.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159661#M42876</guid>
      <dc:creator>emha_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-27T08:18:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA and Oracle Databases.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159662#M42877</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;... but unfortunately time to time I'm reaching throughput capacity limits on EVA8k controler's internal mirror ports. storage vendor (after discussion with HP) tries to persuade me to change R5 to R10 because R10, allegedly, should generate less internal traffic.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;EVA general perf best practices:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/products/storageworks/whitepapers/5982-9140EN.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/products/storageworks/whitepapers/5982-9140EN.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HPUX 11.31 Multipathing:&lt;BR /&gt;HPUX11.31 - MPIO Native (ALUA/ALBA) &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://docs.hp.com/en/native-multi-pathing/native_multipathing_wp_AR0803.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://docs.hp.com/en/native-multi-pathing/native_multipathing_wp_AR0803.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Evaperf for the VDISK perf analysis:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1239472" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1239472&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;RESUME/Notes&lt;BR /&gt;a) LVM on UX/Linux to nicely loadbalance the front end&lt;BR /&gt;b) the more physical disk in the DG the more backend distribution of each VDISK&lt;BR /&gt;c) Multipathin solution, either manual (PVlinks) or automatic (Native MPIO)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Few words on EVA Active/Active and loadbalancing:&lt;BR /&gt;a) all writes are being written into both controllers via the mirror ports&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;b) all reads are driven directly via the managing controller, undirectly via the mirror port&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Host MPIO ALUA optimizes this and communicates directly with EVA managing controller which then reduces the mirror port based reads by the second (proxy) controller&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:33:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159662#M42877</guid>
      <dc:creator>IBaltay</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-27T09:33:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: EVA and Oracle Databases.</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159663#M42878</link>
      <description>Thank you all Gentel Men .</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:29:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/eva-and-oracle-databases/m-p/5159663#M42878</guid>
      <dc:creator>DeafFrog</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-02T11:29:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

