<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Understanding EVA 11MB/S per disk sequential performance in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/understanding-eva-11mb-s-per-disk-sequential-performance/m-p/5237298#M44058</link>
    <description>When trying against a single disk drive, you can do "spiral transfers" - that means an entire track is read from /written to the media.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The EVA splits the data into many smaller chunks of 128KBytes and lays it out on different disk drives. Those arrays are designed for random I/O, not megabyte/second throughput.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:25:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-28T05:25:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Understanding EVA 11MB/S per disk sequential performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/understanding-eva-11mb-s-per-disk-sequential-performance/m-p/5237297#M44057</link>
      <description>Hi Folks,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am relatively new to storage systems and have been educating myself on the ins and outs of the EVA4400 storage system we have at my company.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One thing that has me confused is the sequential i/o performance of each EVA disk. The following HP support document:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01685240" target="_blank"&gt;http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01685240&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;states that:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;-&amp;gt; Per drive MB/s &lt;BR /&gt;-&amp;gt;    Sequential workload = 11MB/s or less&lt;BR /&gt;-&amp;gt;    Random workload = 4 to 6MB/s or less&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Why is this so low when compared with a desktop drive? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example I just tested a USB2 connected 500GB drive with IOMETER on my desktop computer and got 30MB/s throughput with 100% sequential writes, 8k IO size, 8 outstanding requests, Windows caching turned off.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I had a look at the Seagate Cheetah  15K.5 spec sheet and they claim a sustained transfer rate of 73 to 125 MB/s for their 300GB FC drive. (&lt;A href="http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/datasheet/disc/ds_cheetah_15k_5.pdf)" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/datasheet/disc/ds_cheetah_15k_5.pdf)&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What is HP factoring in to their statement about the MB/s?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 04:57:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/understanding-eva-11mb-s-per-disk-sequential-performance/m-p/5237297#M44057</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lancaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-28T04:57:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Understanding EVA 11MB/S per disk sequential performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/understanding-eva-11mb-s-per-disk-sequential-performance/m-p/5237298#M44058</link>
      <description>When trying against a single disk drive, you can do "spiral transfers" - that means an entire track is read from /written to the media.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The EVA splits the data into many smaller chunks of 128KBytes and lays it out on different disk drives. Those arrays are designed for random I/O, not megabyte/second throughput.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:25:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/understanding-eva-11mb-s-per-disk-sequential-performance/m-p/5237298#M44058</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-28T05:25:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Understanding EVA 11MB/S per disk sequential performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/understanding-eva-11mb-s-per-disk-sequential-performance/m-p/5237299#M44059</link>
      <description>Thanks Uwe,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I had thought that may be the case but don't have enough experience with these things to be confident in making that assumption.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for the quick reply</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 05:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/understanding-eva-11mb-s-per-disk-sequential-performance/m-p/5237299#M44059</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lancaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-28T05:30:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Understanding EVA 11MB/S per disk sequential performance</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/understanding-eva-11mb-s-per-disk-sequential-performance/m-p/5237300#M44060</link>
      <description>Closed</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 20:44:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/understanding-eva-11mb-s-per-disk-sequential-performance/m-p/5237300#M44060</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lancaster</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-28T20:44:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

