<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RSM Scripting - RemoveDiskDevice vs. UnpresentStorageVolume in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/rsm-scripting-removediskdevice-vs-unpresentstoragevolume/m-p/5364521#M44994</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm just reviewing some old RSM scripts. I notice a lot of them run the following commands in order&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;UnpresentStorageVolume&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;RemoveDiskDevice&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;From reading the CLI guide, the first command just unpresents the storage from the server. The second command notifies the server before unpresenting the storage (presumably to let the server flush it's write caches etc ??? ).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm just wondering why these two commands would ever appear in this order. Surely you would only run the if the &lt;EM&gt;UnpresentStorageVolume&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;command where the &lt;EM&gt;RemoveDiskDevice&lt;/EM&gt; failed? Also, am I correct in assuming that the &lt;EM&gt;RemoveDiskDevice &lt;/EM&gt;command&amp;nbsp;does something a little more elegant?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts most appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:31:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shocko</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-17T20:31:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RSM Scripting - RemoveDiskDevice vs. UnpresentStorageVolume</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/rsm-scripting-removediskdevice-vs-unpresentstoragevolume/m-p/5364521#M44994</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm just reviewing some old RSM scripts. I notice a lot of them run the following commands in order&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;UnpresentStorageVolume&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;RemoveDiskDevice&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;From reading the CLI guide, the first command just unpresents the storage from the server. The second command notifies the server before unpresenting the storage (presumably to let the server flush it's write caches etc ??? ).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm just wondering why these two commands would ever appear in this order. Surely you would only run the if the &lt;EM&gt;UnpresentStorageVolume&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;command where the &lt;EM&gt;RemoveDiskDevice&lt;/EM&gt; failed? Also, am I correct in assuming that the &lt;EM&gt;RemoveDiskDevice &lt;/EM&gt;command&amp;nbsp;does something a little more elegant?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts most appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:31:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/rsm-scripting-removediskdevice-vs-unpresentstoragevolume/m-p/5364521#M44994</guid>
      <dc:creator>shocko</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-17T20:31:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

