<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DS2300 and 4si versus va7100 in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/ds2300-and-4si-versus-va7100/m-p/3295172#M47702</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm looking at adding some more storage to my HP9000 rp5470. I'm trying to decide between a va7100 and FC card, or another DS2300 and 4si card. I've got my ducks in a row as far as redundancy, etc, but wondering/worried about performance. Either unit will house some Oracle datafiles. Does anyone have any comparison between using a ds2300 on a dedicated raid card versus using a VA7100, as far as access times and raw throughput? note, this is a va7100 not the newer va7110, for the money the price is about the same in this situation. I know the va7100 is bit flexible and advanced form of storage, but am I going to sacrifice raw speed for those luxuries?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;TIA&lt;BR /&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;P.S. This thread has been moved&amp;nbsp;from General to Disk array. - Hp Forum Moderator&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 02:22:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-03T02:22:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DS2300 and 4si versus va7100</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/ds2300-and-4si-versus-va7100/m-p/3295172#M47702</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm looking at adding some more storage to my HP9000 rp5470. I'm trying to decide between a va7100 and FC card, or another DS2300 and 4si card. I've got my ducks in a row as far as redundancy, etc, but wondering/worried about performance. Either unit will house some Oracle datafiles. Does anyone have any comparison between using a ds2300 on a dedicated raid card versus using a VA7100, as far as access times and raw throughput? note, this is a va7100 not the newer va7110, for the money the price is about the same in this situation. I know the va7100 is bit flexible and advanced form of storage, but am I going to sacrifice raw speed for those luxuries?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;TIA&lt;BR /&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;P.S. This thread has been moved&amp;nbsp;from General to Disk array. - Hp Forum Moderator&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 02:22:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/ds2300-and-4si-versus-va7100/m-p/3295172#M47702</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andy Beal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-03T02:22:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DS2300 and 4si versus va7100</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/ds2300-and-4si-versus-va7100/m-p/3295173#M47703</link>
      <description>Doesn't it just come down to Fiber .vs. wired SCSI? THough it is never discussed, I would guess the fiber channel has the advantage. THe specs have FC interconnect speeds of 200MB/sec, but the DS2300 can be run with U320SCSI and should be able to get 320MB/sec in that case instead of the standard 160</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:27:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/ds2300-and-4si-versus-va7100/m-p/3295173#M47703</guid>
      <dc:creator>e4services</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2004-06-04T09:27:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

