<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VA/Nike Performance Utility in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841313#M6519</link>
    <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Postmark is a tool to mesure filesystem performance, you can get it from:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3022.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3022.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Another good performance test is to run a backup to a fast device (or to /dev/null).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 13:50:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leif Halvarsson_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2002-11-08T13:50:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VA/Nike Performance Utility</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841312#M6518</link>
      <description>The problem I am having is with a VA-7400 array. As background I have a software vendor that is updating their software. As it stands, all their old data is on a Nike array and all their new data is on the VA-7400. The vendor is complaining about performance issues on the VA-7400 as compared to the Nike array. When I ask what they are using to justify their claim they waltz around the question. My question is there a utility that I can run to compare throughput on the Nike verses the VA-7400? I am running 11.0 on a K-580.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 13:41:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841312#M6518</guid>
      <dc:creator>MARK OWEN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-08T13:41:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VA/Nike Performance Utility</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841313#M6519</link>
      <description>Hi&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Postmark is a tool to mesure filesystem performance, you can get it from:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3022.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3022.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Another good performance test is to run a backup to a fast device (or to /dev/null).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 13:50:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841313#M6519</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leif Halvarsson_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-08T13:50:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VA/Nike Performance Utility</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841314#M6520</link>
      <description>You can use a tool such as GPM (Glance Plus?) which can report disk utilisation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Let me check my docs as I may have something more.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Chuck J</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 13:50:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841314#M6520</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chuck J</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-08T13:50:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VA/Nike Performance Utility</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841315#M6521</link>
      <description>Mark,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;have a look at this thread:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0x7239eea29889d611abdb0090277a778c,00.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums.itrc.hp.com/cm/QuestionAnswer/1,,0x7239eea29889d611abdb0090277a778c,00.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;live free or die&lt;BR /&gt;harry</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 14:14:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841315#M6521</guid>
      <dc:creator>harry d brown jr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-08T14:14:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VA/Nike Performance Utility</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841316#M6522</link>
      <description>Anyone experiencing performance problems with the VA should upgrade the firmware to HP17 and the latest Command View management software.  Then, enable the new pre-fetch algorithm. This combination can have dramatic results for highly utilized systems, or low concurrency sequential workloads.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try it, let me know what happens&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2002 14:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841316#M6522</guid>
      <dc:creator>Roger_22</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-08T14:35:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VA/Nike Performance Utility</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841317#M6523</link>
      <description>One could use Iozone to get performance data. This is my favorite I/O tool.&lt;BR /&gt;See: &lt;A href="http://www.iozone.org" target="_blank"&gt;www.iozone.org&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2002 15:44:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/va-nike-performance-utility/m-p/2841317#M6523</guid>
      <dc:creator>Don  Capps</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2002-11-09T15:44:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

