<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FC60 Single LUN ramifications in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/fc60-single-lun-ramifications/m-p/2477558#M744</link>
    <description>If you would like to run at some point in time parallel backups you'll have to load ballance manually the directories to backup. The same story for restore. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I hope you don't have a huge numbers onf files/inodes (&amp;gt; 1 million). You'll face file system performace degradation. &lt;BR /&gt;Your DBA will not be happy finding out that he has all the redo logs, data files, indexes, etc on the same file system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ovidiu</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2000 03:04:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ovidiu D. Raita</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2000-12-31T03:04:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FC60 Single LUN ramifications</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/fc60-single-lun-ramifications/m-p/2477557#M743</link>
      <description>We have just installed a HP L series server with a FC60&lt;BR /&gt;disk array. The array is configured with dual fibre-channels, full-bus scsi, four enclosures with 4x36GB disks in each enclosure, (16x36GB array total). The array was brought on-line as a single LUN, 16 disk, 245GB logical volume, raid 0/1, primary and mirror drives on separate enclosures. I have suggested that this configuration will not load balance or utilize the second fibre channel but are there other problems with this type of deployment other than I/O?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:10:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/fc60-single-lun-ramifications/m-p/2477557#M743</guid>
      <dc:creator>Dave Fenner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-12-30T00:10:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FC60 Single LUN ramifications</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/fc60-single-lun-ramifications/m-p/2477558#M744</link>
      <description>If you would like to run at some point in time parallel backups you'll have to load ballance manually the directories to backup. The same story for restore. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I hope you don't have a huge numbers onf files/inodes (&amp;gt; 1 million). You'll face file system performace degradation. &lt;BR /&gt;Your DBA will not be happy finding out that he has all the redo logs, data files, indexes, etc on the same file system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Ovidiu</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2000 03:04:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/fc60-single-lun-ramifications/m-p/2477558#M744</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ovidiu D. Raita</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-12-31T03:04:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

