<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: sar and VA7400 in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/sar-and-va7400/m-p/2985041#M8593</link>
    <description>Thanks for responses.&lt;BR /&gt;I think AutoRaid VA7400 works ok,  disks are equally loaded only I cannot interpret armperf metrics Command Latency.&lt;BR /&gt;Does the value avque=0.50 mean that array is able to process requests without long waiting even if %busy is 90?&lt;BR /&gt;Should I rather concentrate on tuning application?&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you both.&lt;BR /&gt;Jarka&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 10:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Holcova Jarmila</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-05-30T10:57:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>sar and VA7400</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/sar-and-va7400/m-p/2985038#M8590</link>
      <description>How relevant the sar output is for logical disk (LUN) of VA7400 array?&lt;BR /&gt;sar -d&lt;BR /&gt;device %busy avque r+w/s blks/s avwait avserv&lt;BR /&gt;c3t0d5 90.82  0.50  231  9147    5.07   5.72&lt;BR /&gt;c3t0d5 92.19  0.50  242 10063    5.07   6.00&lt;BR /&gt;c3t0d5 91.74  0.50  230  9289    5.06   5.98&lt;BR /&gt;c3t0d5 90.65  0.50  237 10567    5.08   5.76&lt;BR /&gt;sar -u&lt;BR /&gt;00:00:00    %usr    %sys    %wio   %idle&lt;BR /&gt;10:20:00      50      13      31       6&lt;BR /&gt;10:40:00      44      12      38       6&lt;BR /&gt;11:00:00      42      12      39       6&lt;BR /&gt;11:20:00      44      12      40       4&lt;BR /&gt;11:40:00      42      13      39       6&lt;BR /&gt;12:00:01      47       9      38       6&lt;BR /&gt;12:20:01      54      11      31       4&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks for ideas&lt;BR /&gt;Jarka</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 08:48:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/sar-and-va7400/m-p/2985038#M8590</guid>
      <dc:creator>Holcova Jarmila</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-30T08:48:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sar and VA7400</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/sar-and-va7400/m-p/2985039#M8591</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;usually is quite accurate.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I see the disk have a very high % busy, and therefore your system has high %wio.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Usually %wio must be less than 10% on a weel tuned system.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You are trasferring about 5Mb/s, and it's not much for a VA, may be you are doing work on may small files.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your system is pretty busy with user and system%... are your application tuned well ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To get accurate stats i use&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;sar -d 3 100&lt;BR /&gt;, to sample every 3 seconds and not to interfere too much with work.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH,&lt;BR /&gt;  Massimo&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 09:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/sar-and-va7400/m-p/2985039#M8591</guid>
      <dc:creator>Massimo Bianchi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-30T09:01:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sar and VA7400</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/sar-and-va7400/m-p/2985040#M8592</link>
      <description>Jakra,&lt;BR /&gt;'sar' measures storage perfomance at the host side. To have whole picture how VA performs use CommandView 'armperf' command to view whole array or LUN-specific perfomance data. This utility generates comma-delimited formatted file, thus you can import it to excel&lt;BR /&gt;Eugeny</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 09:21:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/sar-and-va7400/m-p/2985040#M8592</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eugeny Brychkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-30T09:21:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sar and VA7400</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/sar-and-va7400/m-p/2985041#M8593</link>
      <description>Thanks for responses.&lt;BR /&gt;I think AutoRaid VA7400 works ok,  disks are equally loaded only I cannot interpret armperf metrics Command Latency.&lt;BR /&gt;Does the value avque=0.50 mean that array is able to process requests without long waiting even if %busy is 90?&lt;BR /&gt;Should I rather concentrate on tuning application?&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you both.&lt;BR /&gt;Jarka&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 10:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/sar-and-va7400/m-p/2985041#M8593</guid>
      <dc:creator>Holcova Jarmila</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-30T10:57:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: sar and VA7400</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/sar-and-va7400/m-p/2985042#M8594</link>
      <description>Hi, &lt;BR /&gt;i think avque is AVerage QUEue, so a value of 0,5 if O.K., no request are queued for later service, even if your disk are 90% busy.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It might be a problem if you avque gets up to higher values.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;    Massimo&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 11:18:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/sar-and-va7400/m-p/2985042#M8594</guid>
      <dc:creator>Massimo Bianchi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-30T11:18:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

