<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: RAID 3/5? in Disk Enclosures</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/raid-3-5/m-p/2985124#M8602</link>
    <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;RAID 3/5 is ONE RAID level.  RAID 3 has an excellent data rate but poor request rate, on the other hand, RAID 5 has excellent read performance but moderate write performance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If the controller is able to handle both parity generation schemes of RAID 3 and RAID 5, and uses them in case of advantage, the combination of them gives better write throughput overall compared to the pure RAID 3 or RAID 5 implementations.  It is just the best out of both RAID levels.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH,&lt;BR /&gt;Vince</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2003 07:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Vincent Farrugia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2003-06-02T07:25:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>RAID 3/5?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/raid-3-5/m-p/2985121#M8599</link>
      <description>What does "RAID 3/5" mean?  My HSG80 uses this terminology, but I can't find an explanation.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My understanding is that RAID 3 is striping with a dedicated parity disk, while RAID 5 is striping with distributed parity.  What am I missing?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 10:55:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/raid-3-5/m-p/2985121#M8599</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brian_195</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-30T10:55:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID 3/5?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/raid-3-5/m-p/2985122#M8600</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;You are correct about RAID 3 and RAID 5. You can read about "RAID Storagesets" in the manual for HSG80 (see page 2-23).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/products/storageworks/techdoc/acs/AA-RFBEJ-TE.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;ftp://ftp.compaq.com/pub/products/storageworks/techdoc/acs/AA-RFBEJ-TE.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As I can find RAID 3/5 uses distributed parity (and should be a RAID 5). I can't see the difference.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2003 12:20:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/raid-3-5/m-p/2985122#M8600</guid>
      <dc:creator>Leif Halvarsson_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-05-30T12:20:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID 3/5?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/raid-3-5/m-p/2985123#M8601</link>
      <description>Brian&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Both Raid levels stripe over multiple disks.  The difference is in the placement of the parity data. R3 has a dedicated parity disk while R5 distibutes parity over all disks. &lt;BR /&gt;R3 is optimal for sequential data while R5 is better for random access. &lt;BR /&gt;Read more in the attached doc.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cheers&lt;BR /&gt;Peter</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2003 07:15:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/raid-3-5/m-p/2985123#M8601</guid>
      <dc:creator>Peter Mattei</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-02T07:15:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: RAID 3/5?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/raid-3-5/m-p/2985124#M8602</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;RAID 3/5 is ONE RAID level.  RAID 3 has an excellent data rate but poor request rate, on the other hand, RAID 5 has excellent read performance but moderate write performance.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If the controller is able to handle both parity generation schemes of RAID 3 and RAID 5, and uses them in case of advantage, the combination of them gives better write throughput overall compared to the pure RAID 3 or RAID 5 implementations.  It is just the best out of both RAID levels.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HTH,&lt;BR /&gt;Vince</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2003 07:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/raid-3-5/m-p/2985124#M8602</guid>
      <dc:creator>Vincent Farrugia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2003-06-02T07:25:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

