https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/binding-luns/m-p/2481363#M867 Hello<BR /><BR />Unlike Nike, FC60, AutoRAID has no concept of ownership when you create LUNs.<BR />From lvm viewpoint, you can make load-balancing possible.<BR />By creating the mutiple number of LUNs instead of a single large LUN, you can improve performance.<BR />This is done by the size of command queue increased indicating that enough commands are queued to keep the disk aray busy.<BR /><BR />Regards, Thu, 11 Jan 2001 05:06:36 GMT Insu Kim 2001-01-11T05:06:36Z https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/binding-luns/m-p/2481362#M866 I am new to the model 12H autoraid array, but have years of experience with a Nike (sp620) array.<BR /><BR />When you bind the LUNS on the Nike, depending on which controller you are connected to, the ownership of the LUN varies.<BR /><BR />I just went through and bound some LUNS on autoraid now, and it appears that the "primary" controller owns them all? <BR /><BR />Should I be alternately setting each controller to primary as I build the LUNS to balance the load? Or is it sufficient to just use primary/alternate paths in LVM when creating the volume groups/logical volumes?<BR /><BR />Thanks a lot!<BR />Tim Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:44:48 GMT https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/binding-luns/m-p/2481362#M866 Tim Medford 2001-01-10T16:44:48Z https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/binding-luns/m-p/2481363#M867 Hello<BR /><BR />Unlike Nike, FC60, AutoRAID has no concept of ownership when you create LUNs.<BR />From lvm viewpoint, you can make load-balancing possible.<BR />By creating the mutiple number of LUNs instead of a single large LUN, you can improve performance.<BR />This is done by the size of command queue increased indicating that enough commands are queued to keep the disk aray busy.<BR /><BR />Regards, Thu, 11 Jan 2001 05:06:36 GMT https://community.hpe.com/t5/disk-enclosures/binding-luns/m-p/2481363#M867 Insu Kim 2001-01-11T05:06:36Z