<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dat72 compression in HPE StoreEver Tape Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-storeever-tape-storage/dat72-compression/m-p/3965356#M19947</link>
    <description>I've exactly the same problem . Have you find a solution to fix it ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please help me.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:57:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Briag</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-09-10T14:57:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dat72 compression</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-storeever-tape-storage/dat72-compression/m-p/3965355#M19946</link>
      <description>This subject has been raised by other people before, but I am still unclear as to the way forward.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am using an external SCSI C7438A Dat72 drive on Windows SBS 2003 using Backup Exec 10 SBE. When installing backup Exec, I chose to use their drivers and had not previously installed the HP drivers which came with the tape backup unit.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Everything works fine, but selecting to use hardware compression appears to be no different than selecting no compression at all and I can get no more than about 33GB on the tape.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have loaded the latest LTT software, updated to the latest firmware, enabled hardware compression and the tests show that I am getting 2.2:1 compression.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What I refuse to believe is that with a wide range of system files, Exchange files and general Word and other database files being backed up, that the actual compression on a real backup can be 1:1. There has to be something which although Backup Exec appears to allow me to use hardware compression, in fact it is not.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can anyone suggest a way forward or further tests I can carry out?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:58:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-storeever-tape-storage/dat72-compression/m-p/3965355#M19946</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tim Stainton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-03-20T10:58:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dat72 compression</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-storeever-tape-storage/dat72-compression/m-p/3965356#M19947</link>
      <description>I've exactly the same problem . Have you find a solution to fix it ?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Please help me.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:57:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-storeever-tape-storage/dat72-compression/m-p/3965356#M19947</guid>
      <dc:creator>Briag</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-09-10T14:57:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

