<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Two 4/40 Libraries to one Fibre Controller on K-Class in StoreEver Tape Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storeever-tape-storage/two-4-40-libraries-to-one-fibre-controller-on-k-class/m-p/2470129#M304</link>
    <description>I would not go for the hub solution. Streaming 4 drives over one loop (100MB/sec) might cause congestions and all sorts of other nasty problems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Brocade solution is a better one but I believe only Quickloop is supported at this time. Quickloop behaves like Loop but without the performance penalties that a real FC Hub would impose.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cal.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2000 23:29:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eric de Lange_2</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2000-12-05T23:29:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Two 4/40 Libraries to one Fibre Controller on K-Class</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storeever-tape-storage/two-4-40-libraries-to-one-fibre-controller-on-k-class/m-p/2470127#M302</link>
      <description>Is the above supported through HP SureStore E Hub L10 or Brocade 2400 if the two 4x40 have been upgraded to fibre using product #A5590A?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2000 16:08:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storeever-tape-storage/two-4-40-libraries-to-one-fibre-controller-on-k-class/m-p/2470127#M302</guid>
      <dc:creator>AstraZeneca Unix Staff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-12-04T16:08:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two 4/40 Libraries to one Fibre Controller on K-Class</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storeever-tape-storage/two-4-40-libraries-to-one-fibre-controller-on-k-class/m-p/2470128#M303</link>
      <description>No.  You'll have streaming problems &lt;BR /&gt;causing a corrupted backup.  &lt;BR /&gt;Two hubs one host adaptor one lib.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2000 12:20:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storeever-tape-storage/two-4-40-libraries-to-one-fibre-controller-on-k-class/m-p/2470128#M303</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill McNAMARA_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-12-05T12:20:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two 4/40 Libraries to one Fibre Controller on K-Class</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storeever-tape-storage/two-4-40-libraries-to-one-fibre-controller-on-k-class/m-p/2470129#M304</link>
      <description>I would not go for the hub solution. Streaming 4 drives over one loop (100MB/sec) might cause congestions and all sorts of other nasty problems.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The Brocade solution is a better one but I believe only Quickloop is supported at this time. Quickloop behaves like Loop but without the performance penalties that a real FC Hub would impose.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cal.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2000 23:29:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/storeever-tape-storage/two-4-40-libraries-to-one-fibre-controller-on-k-class/m-p/2470129#M304</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eric de Lange_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2000-12-05T23:29:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

