<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: secure path in General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/general/secure-path/m-p/3529046#M2646</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;No you won't get twice the speed.&lt;BR /&gt;The FC connection will be faster, but the main bottleneck is your VA and it's disks. so you will get some performance increase, but not 100% (or close to it). Main reason for using securepath is extra security: if one path fails you still have access through the other path.&lt;BR /&gt;...I think that's why they called it securepath an not fastpath ;-)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Marco</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:31:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marco Hogeveen_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2005-04-21T01:31:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>secure path</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/general/secure-path/m-p/3529045#M2645</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In Features &amp;amp; benefits list of secure path,HP said it can increased the performance. I want to know if I use secure path and have access to VA from 2 diffrent pathes, write &amp;amp; read speed will be 2 times faster? I mean if write speed on to the VA be 80 MB/S, it will be 80*2=160 MB/S by secure path?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Alireza</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:02:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/general/secure-path/m-p/3529045#M2645</guid>
      <dc:creator>Delrish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-21T01:02:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: secure path</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/general/secure-path/m-p/3529046#M2646</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;No you won't get twice the speed.&lt;BR /&gt;The FC connection will be faster, but the main bottleneck is your VA and it's disks. so you will get some performance increase, but not 100% (or close to it). Main reason for using securepath is extra security: if one path fails you still have access through the other path.&lt;BR /&gt;...I think that's why they called it securepath an not fastpath ;-)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hope this helps,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Marco</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:31:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/general/secure-path/m-p/3529046#M2646</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marco Hogeveen_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2005-04-21T01:31:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

