<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic expected? ~50% less read performance between Microserver gen8 * Microserver gen10+ in Servers - General</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/servers-general/expected-50-less-read-performance-between-microserver-gen8/m-p/7157002#M16182</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did have a microserver gen8 with 4 sata drives in RAID5 connected to P410-512Mb in R70/W30 ratio with 1 bootLD of 512Gb and data volume remaining.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now I moved and imported the 2 LD's on to E208i controller on a new micrserver gen10+ with equal server 2019 and memory but my average read using HDtune from 400MB/s went down to 240MB/s. I know that the E208i is entry without cache; but is that all causing the significant drop in read speed? It would almost make me suggest to just stick the P410-512 over to&amp;nbsp; the Gen10+ microserver although un-supported just to get my speed back.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any suggestions on tuning this? Or is it a simple architecture limitation of the E208i compared to P410?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 21:32:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeroen_Kleen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-20T21:32:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>expected? ~50% less read performance between Microserver gen8 * Microserver gen10+</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/servers-general/expected-50-less-read-performance-between-microserver-gen8/m-p/7157002#M16182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did have a microserver gen8 with 4 sata drives in RAID5 connected to P410-512Mb in R70/W30 ratio with 1 bootLD of 512Gb and data volume remaining.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Now I moved and imported the 2 LD's on to E208i controller on a new micrserver gen10+ with equal server 2019 and memory but my average read using HDtune from 400MB/s went down to 240MB/s. I know that the E208i is entry without cache; but is that all causing the significant drop in read speed? It would almost make me suggest to just stick the P410-512 over to&amp;nbsp; the Gen10+ microserver although un-supported just to get my speed back.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Any suggestions on tuning this? Or is it a simple architecture limitation of the E208i compared to P410?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2021 21:32:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/servers-general/expected-50-less-read-performance-between-microserver-gen8/m-p/7157002#M16182</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jeroen_Kleen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-20T21:32:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

