<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Proliant Network Teaming - Windows Load Balancing - Procurve Trunking in Networking</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589380#M1823</link>
    <description>Darren, it depends of what your goal is. If you are looking for bandwidht, I would recommend using 802.3ad Teaming mode, this will require an LACP channel to be configured on the procurve switch:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;trunk x,y trk1 lacp&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;.Lmm</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:37:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lmm_1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-24T00:37:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proliant Network Teaming - Windows Load Balancing - Procurve Trunking</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589379#M1822</link>
      <description>I have a few Proliant 380 SQL servers that I would like to get the best network thruput possible.&lt;BR /&gt;I have teamed the onboard GB nics, now I guess my question is:&lt;BR /&gt;1.  Do I also need to enable Windows Load Balancing?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2.  Do I need to create a trunk for these connections in my procurve Switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've read quite a few questions &amp;amp; answers regarding this, but no clear cut yes or no answers :)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you for your time!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;D</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:37:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589379#M1822</guid>
      <dc:creator>Darren Etheridge_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-23T16:37:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proliant Network Teaming - Windows Load Balancing - Procurve Trunking</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589380#M1823</link>
      <description>Darren, it depends of what your goal is. If you are looking for bandwidht, I would recommend using 802.3ad Teaming mode, this will require an LACP channel to be configured on the procurve switch:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;trunk x,y trk1 lacp&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;.Lmm</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:37:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589380#M1823</guid>
      <dc:creator>Lmm_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T00:37:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proliant Network Teaming - Windows Load Balancing - Procurve Trunking</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589381#M1824</link>
      <description>Best throughput possible in what sense?  Single connection throughput?  Multiple connections between two machines?  Multiple connections from one machine to many other machines?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:42:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589381#M1824</guid>
      <dc:creator>rick jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T00:42:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proliant Network Teaming - Windows Load Balancing - Procurve Trunking</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589382#M1825</link>
      <description>Multiple Connections from one machine to another machine thrua procurve switch</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:19:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589382#M1825</guid>
      <dc:creator>Darren Etheridge_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T04:19:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proliant Network Teaming - Windows Load Balancing - Procurve Trunking</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589383#M1826</link>
      <description>It seems the Procurve switch is automatically setting up a trunk (Dyn1) for the teamed connections... is this prefered ?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:22:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589383#M1826</guid>
      <dc:creator>Darren Etheridge_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T04:22:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proliant Network Teaming - Windows Load Balancing - Procurve Trunking</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589384#M1827</link>
      <description>Personally, I prefer to manually create the trunks using the command in a previuos thread. &lt;BR /&gt;trunk 1,2 trk1 lacp&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That assumes that the ports 1 and 2 are connected to the server. and you dont have a static trk1 already configured.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also if you have more than one procurve switch you can use dt-lacp.But lets not run before you can walk.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589384#M1827</guid>
      <dc:creator>Andrew Pearce</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T11:10:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proliant Network Teaming - Windows Load Balancing - Procurve Trunking</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589385#M1828</link>
      <description>Multiple connections between the same two machines suggests a few things:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) load balancing algorithms in both the host(s) and the switch which include layer four protocol addressing information (ie TCP port numbers)&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) using 10G Ethernet rather than 1G and eschew the whole trunking thing save for HA.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If either the host or the switch cannot include layer four addressing information in the load balancing algorithm you might need to fall-back on:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1a) using multiple IP addresses on the hosts and making certain your multiple connections are spread across those IP addresses&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Backing up a bit, and since my forte is more networking than database - it is my understanding that SQL is rather "request response" and not generally bulk throughput.  Do you have any stats about the average packet size in/out of your systems serving SQL?  Small packet performance may care rather more about stack path length and intra-host load balancing than the bitrate of the link(s) connected to the host.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:39:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/networking/proliant-network-teaming-windows-load-balancing-procurve/m-p/4589385#M1828</guid>
      <dc:creator>rick jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T17:39:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

