<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: What's better with two switches: only one fabric or two? in HPE EVA Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890847#M22371</link>
    <description>If you connect both switches, you have created one management domain. An error will affect the whole domain. Two separate switches will create two management domains.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The additional paths resulting from the ISL do not provide much added protection: e.g. the failure of a single end-node port is not compensated by the ISL.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-11-02T07:16:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What's better with two switches: only one fabric or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890842#M22366</link>
      <description>I have two switches Brocade 4/64 with 10 HP-UX and Windows 2003 servers, a XP12000 (8 ports connected to each switch) and a tape library. Most of the servers are configured with two FC adapters, one in each switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What's the best option for the SAN:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A) Configure two independent fabrics, one in each switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;B) Configure an ISL between the switches and set up only one fabric.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Are they the same or are there any pros or cons?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:19:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890842#M22366</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carlos F. Baladrón</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-01T14:19:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What's better with two switches: only one fabric or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890843#M22367</link>
      <description>I would recommend two separate fabrics - that way if some component went berzerk in one fabric you'd still have a fabric capable of supporting operations.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The other downside of connecting the switches is that now each HBA will have twice as many paths to each disk - half of them will be "efficient" (i.e. one hop) and half of them will be "less efficient" (two hops). I don't think the driver in the server would have any way to distinguish between the two.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:26:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890843#M22367</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mark Poeschl_2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-01T15:26:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What's better with two switches: only one fabric or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890844#M22368</link>
      <description>Hi carlos,&lt;BR /&gt;I prefered to go with two fabric since you design the redundancy in the san environment since you have got two FC adapters in each servers.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;regards&lt;BR /&gt;Mano</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:27:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890844#M22368</guid>
      <dc:creator>V.Manoharan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-01T15:27:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What's better with two switches: only one fabric or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890845#M22369</link>
      <description>Carlos:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;HP recommends that you configure in a way to provide a "No Single Point of Failure".  In following this rule... you have multiple paths to storage, multiple HBA's, multiple switches...  You need to keep things separate in order to be sure that 1 item does not effect the 2nd like item.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;In other words, you want 2 independent fabrics.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;If you configure as only one fabric, changes you make can potentially effect ALL of your devices on the SAN. By having 2 separate fabrics, any change you make on fabric "A", will not effect Fabric "B".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Definitely not the same.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steven</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 15:30:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890845#M22369</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Clementi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-01T15:30:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What's better with two switches: only one fabric or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890846#M22370</link>
      <description>If, this undoubtedly with 2 fabrics the changes in one would not affect to the other one and also the fact of have Not â  Singe Point of failureâ  , but in the supposition that a switch (case b) Down  could I continue working with the switch that this up without lost of service.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I ask this because for the client their main priority is to have the services up in the case of failure of a switch.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Not I understand what you mean with  half of them will be "efficient"</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:58:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890846#M22370</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carlos F. Baladrón</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-02T06:58:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What's better with two switches: only one fabric or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890847#M22371</link>
      <description>If you connect both switches, you have created one management domain. An error will affect the whole domain. Two separate switches will create two management domains.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The additional paths resulting from the ISL do not provide much added protection: e.g. the failure of a single end-node port is not compensated by the ISL.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 07:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890847#M22371</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-02T07:16:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What's better with two switches: only one fabric or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890848#M22372</link>
      <description>&lt;BR /&gt;You are right Uwe but, we don't want to get additional path we want to get it is high availability; in the case of failure in a switch&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:01:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890848#M22372</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carlos F. Baladrón</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-02T08:01:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What's better with two switches: only one fabric or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890849#M22373</link>
      <description>Well, then don't connect them (option A) so that a human/software error on one switch does not affect the other.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:12:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890849#M22373</guid>
      <dc:creator>Uwe Zessin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-02T08:12:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What's better with two switches: only one fabric or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890850#M22374</link>
      <description>If you have only one fabirc, the failure of a switch could potentially cause fabric wide problems.  You want to have 2 separate fabrics for High Availability.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Steven</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 09:44:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890850#M22374</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steven Clementi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-02T09:44:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What's better with two switches: only one fabric or two?</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890851#M22375</link>
      <description>Thank you to all for the answers, this clearing the best option is 2 fabric (case a)</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 10:10:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/what-s-better-with-two-switches-only-one-fabric-or-two/m-p/3890851#M22375</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carlos F. Baladrón</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-11-02T10:10:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

