<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Autopath question in HPE EVA Storage</title>
    <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999380#M25507</link>
    <description>And yes on the less bandwidth policy question.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BTW, are all your XP10000 Front Ends also 4Gbps provisioned?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:27:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Autopath question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999375#M25502</link>
      <description>I am planning the config of an hpux server with 4 fibre connections thru two switches connected to an xp10000.  The server will be running autopath to load balance the io across all 4 ports.  If I were to zone and run a tape drive on 1 of the ports would autopath detect this io load and shift the disk io to the remaining 3 fiber ports?  In other words, is autopath looking at the fiber card port load or some other disk only io value to determine how busy the port is?  Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 11:09:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999375#M25502</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edward Bender</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T11:09:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Autopath question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999376#M25503</link>
      <description>Edward, you'll be actually be better off with just using VxVM and DMP with your quad-pathed LUNs from an XP1000.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Moreover, I think you will get better performance if you do not quad path but simply dual path each LDEV/LUN.. if you've 100 LDEVs and 4 FC's, present 50 to the 1st pair and the other 50 to the other pair -- always making sure your storage VOLS/LVOLS are made up of LUNS from each component LDEVs spread out from each pair.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As far as AutoPath or any Multipathing/Load balancing detecting your Tape/Backup load on one FC path -- it will not detect it per se but AutoPath/DMP will try to use whatever balancing policy you've set it to.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BTW, it is still not a good idea to mix Disk and Tape LUNs on the same HBA/zone...  It is still best for Tape LUNS to be on their own FC-HBAs and zone.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:13:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999376#M25503</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:13:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Autopath question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999377#M25504</link>
      <description>So, if I use the policy "Least Bandwidth", will autopath detect the traffic from the tape and use the other ports more?  I know it is better not to mix tape/disk but I may have to until I can afford to purchase additional hba's and switch ports.  Is 4, 4gig ports, overkill for an hpux server running a 1gig database?  Would I be better off just using 2 ports for disk and 1 for tape instead of combining disk/tape on one of the four?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999377#M25504</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edward Bender</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:22:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Autopath question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999378#M25505</link>
      <description>Wow, if you're using 4Gbps HBAs and also 4Gbps Switch ports, I really do not think you need 4 of them -- specially for just a 1GB Database...&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:25:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999378#M25505</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:25:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Autopath question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999379#M25506</link>
      <description>Sorry, I ment a 1 Terabyte Database (SAP/Oracle)</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999379#M25506</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edward Bender</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:27:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Autopath question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999380#M25507</link>
      <description>And yes on the less bandwidth policy question.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;BTW, are all your XP10000 Front Ends also 4Gbps provisioned?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:27:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999380#M25507</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:27:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Autopath question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999381#M25508</link>
      <description>Yes 4x4GBps would be considered standard these days for TB sized DB instances -- but it really all depends on your database... the best is ovserve per HBA IOPS/BPS rates if you're hitting limits already ...&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:29:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999381#M25508</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alzhy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:29:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Autopath question</title>
      <link>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999382#M25509</link>
      <description>Yes, all of the XP10k front ends are 4gig.  Our engineer is using only 8 of them.  4 are to be used for SAP data and the other 4 are for email and other windows server data.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:31:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.hpe.com/t5/hpe-eva-storage/autopath-question/m-p/3999382#M25509</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edward Bender</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-05-14T13:31:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

